>
>
>> Where everyone seems to agree is the platform package naming structure needs
>> fixing. I'm happy with Andrew's suggestion, elaborated by Ryan.
>>
>> I also agree with Olivier's suggestion of a root "Driver" directory.
>>
>> While we're at it, we could also bring FatPkg and BaseTools in
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Dan Handley wrote:
>> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: 29 July 2013 16:42
>> To: Grant Likely
>> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Olivier Martin
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] Platform Specific Contributi
> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
> Sent: 29 July 2013 16:42
> To: Grant Likely
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Olivier Martin
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Platform Specific Contribution
>
> On 27 July 2013 21:50, Grant Likely wrote:
> > [cc'
On 27 July 2013 21:50, Grant Likely wrote:
> [cc'ing ryan; he already has to deal with keeping multiple platforms
> in sync with mainline]
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Fish wrote:
>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 3:07 AM, Olivier Martin wrote:
>>
>> > Grant did some investigation a while ag
[cc'ing ryan; he already has to deal with keeping multiple platforms
in sync with mainline]
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Fish wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2013, at 3:07 AM, Olivier Martin wrote:
>
> > Grant did some investigation a while ago when Linaro started to work on UEFI
> > – see his em
rom: Andrew Fish [mailto:af...@apple.com]
> Sent: 25 July 2013 00:57
> To: Chip Ueltschey
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Platform Specific Contribution
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Chip Ueltschey wrote:
>
>
> I think it wo
t
Subject: Re: [edk2] Platform Specific Contribution
On Jul 24, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Chip Ueltschey wrote:
I think it would be good to find some way to organize this better.
Currently the DuetPkg and Nt32Pkg are part of the UDK releases. I think it
would be better to have a grouping of packages
On Jul 24, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Chip Ueltschey wrote:
> I think it would be good to find some way to organize this better.
> Currently the DuetPkg and Nt32Pkg are part of the UDK releases. I think it
> would be better to have a grouping of packages related to emulator support
> that included thes
I think it would be good to find some way to organize this better.
Currently the DuetPkg and Nt32Pkg are part of the UDK releases. I think it
would be better to have a grouping of packages related to emulator support
that included these as well as EmulatorPkg, UnixPkg and OvmfPkg, and then
remove t
I've not seen any thoughts on this so here goes. Some one who understands
source control better than me might have a better idea.
I think something like this could work with git.
Add a Platform directory to /trunk/edk2. Move EmulatorPkg, Nt32Pkg, OvmfPkg (we
could make this a separate project
Hi All,
Is Tianocore.org supports platform specific contribution? I have seen
couple of Arm Platform sources in ArmPlatformPkg and Ti BeagleBoard source.
If so, Who is the contact point for creating such packages?
Thanks
Siva
The information contained in this message may be confidential
11 matches
Mail list logo
