On 05/01/13 19:41, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> There is a complete implementation of the WaitForPackat event in
> MdeModulePlg/Universal/Network/SnpDxe. Many implementations of
> WaitForPacket that use a template structure will allocate and
> initialize the WaitForPackat field to NULL. Logic late
packet.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 4:53 PM
To: Kinney, Michael D
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] three SNP questions
Hello Mike,
On 04/29/13 22:26, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> Laszlo,
>
Hello Mike,
On 04/29/13 22:26, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> Laszlo,
>
> You should implement the WaitForPacket event. This is not documented
> as optional in the UEFI Specification. I think the reason that
> drivers can get away with not implementing the WaitForPacket event is
> that this fields
aszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 12:11 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] three SNP questions
On 04/29/13 20:19, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've been staring for hours at the Driver Writer's Guide and the Spec,
>
On 04/29/13 20:19, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've been staring for hours at the Driver Writer's Guide and the Spec,
> plus existing (apparently, with each other inconsistent) SNP
> implementations in the edk2 tree. I think I'm finally able to ask two
> (maybe three) questions.
>
> (1) Can I i
Hi.
I've been staring for hours at the Driver Writer's Guide and the Spec,
plus existing (apparently, with each other inconsistent) SNP
implementations in the edk2 tree. I think I'm finally able to ask two
(maybe three) questions.
(1) Can I ignore implementing (= set to NULL) the WaitForPacket ev
