On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Jim Clark wrote:
> HI
>
> On 7 Dec 1999, Magill, Brett wrote:
> > I am a graduate student in sociology studying individual's perceptions of
> > control (locus of control) using existing data. The data set include four
> > items to measure this construct which were taken from
Worked fine for me toobet you're on a PC (vs Mac)
Neil W Rickert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Lawlor Griffiths) writes:
>
> >For those interested in mathematics and mind...
>
> >I'm running a simple psychology experiment over the internet. It
> >doesn't take much time, and very lit
Thanks!
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Peter Parzer wrote:
> try stata http://www.stata.com
>
> David Cross/Psych Dept/TCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Check out the following websites:
>
> : http://forrest.psych.unc.edu/
>
> : http://www.linuxapps.com/
>
> : Cheers,
> : David Cross
>
> : On Thu, 2
While randomization ideally eliminates the need for pre-measurement, in
practice group sizes of 5 are insufficient to insure a reasonable
probability the randomization was successful. See Hsu (1989, Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology).
--
Robert McGrath, Ph.D.
Professor
School of Psy
This is JSE -
== Table of Contents
=
Volume 7, Number 3 (November 1999)
Articles
Juliet Popper Shaffer and Yung-Pin Chen, "A Novel Method of Proof With an
Application to Regression" (66K)
Christine
On 8 Dec 1999 15:53:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Magill, Brett)
wrote:
> Mike,
>
> With randomization pre, it is not necessary to take a pre-intervention
> measurement. Test the difference in confidence following the training. If
> it is significant, there is a difference. Decide what directio
HI
On 7 Dec 1999, Magill, Brett wrote:
> I am a graduate student in sociology studying individual's perceptions of
> control (locus of control) using existing data. The data set include four
> items to measure this construct which were taken from a larger scale of more
> than twenty, the larger
Rich Strauss wrote:
> In my fields of interest (ecology and evolutionary biology), it is
becoming
> increasing common to refer to two "kinds" of bootstrapping: nonparametric
> bootstrapping, in which replicate samples are drawn randomly with
> replacement from the original sample; and parametric b
There was an interesting comment on this thread - assessing post-test
measures following training - on the list last night. Sorry, but I've
deleted the message and I don't remember who the author was. The comments
were:
the subjects aren't blind to which condition they're in, which
introduce
Information pertaining to the format of submitted manuscripts:
Papers submitted to MMBIA00 should be prepared in the CVPR00
format for which style files in tex and word are available
under the CVPR webpages. There is an eight page limit.
Further details are
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Mike Wogan wrote:
> Donald,
>
> I'm a firm believer in the effects of Maxwell's Demon.
>
> Mike
Ah. That explains it!
-- Don.
Donald F. Burrill
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Joe Ward wrote, in response to part of my reply to
Mike Wogan:
MW> If there is a pre-post measurement of self-confidence, then you need a
MW> mixed model Anova, with Training vs. No Training as the between groups
MW> factor and Pre-Post as the within groups factor.
>
DB> Th
12 matches
Mail list logo
