San wrote:
>
> Would there be some cases which the p-value are so difficult to find
> that it's nearly impossible?
I'm tempted to say "not under a randomization model" but, yes, there
are many problems for which P values are not readily available.
Perhaps P values are unavailable for *most* pr
What I can propose is rather simple, so it may well be completely wrong
(especially as no true expert has posted anything on the topic so far), but
perhaps it will be of some use:
why not pool data for an individual over time-periods - say, months, or to
preserve more information, weeks? (Perhaps
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, dennis roberts wrote in part:
> one nice full issue of a journal about this general topic of
> hull hypothesis testing ...
Dealing with problems in naval architecture, one presumes?
-- Don.
Would there be some cases which the p-value are so difficult to find
that it's nearly impossible? Is this a kind of limitation to the
hypothesis testing using p-value? Is there any substitute for the
p-value?
Thx for ur reply.
Jerry Dallal wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>
> > (1) statistical significan
one nice full issue of a journal about this general topic of hull
hypothesis testing that i came across recently is:
Research in the Schools, Vol 5, Number 2, Fall 1998 ...
you could contact jim mclean at ... jmclean@ etsu.edu ... and inquire about
obtaining a copy
we are in the process of co
Dale Glaser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I know this has been mentioned before, but would someone be kind enough to
: provide the info. on publisher/ISB # etc for the recently revised
: Educational and Psychological Testing standards...thank you...dale
: glaser
: ===
Hello everybody,
in one of the clinical projects we consult on data analysis, I am
facing a problem I have not yet come across and that leaves me with no
idea on how to proceed. The problem pertains to the dimension of
the outcome data set. In a repeated measures design, let N be the
number o
I wrote:
> (1) statistical significance usually is unrelated to practice
> importance.
I meant to type "practical importance".
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGE
I´m not sure of how to calculate the R and S-statistic.
If I have a timeserie like this:
10-20-25-30-40 =X(t)
The first R/S: - just two values.
avg of X(1) and X(2) = 15
S= of X(1) and X(2) =(10-15)+(20-15) =sqrt(50)=7.1
R=max deviation from mean - min deviation from mean = 5-(-5)
I believe that "scorecard" is an antiqueted word that is based on the
way Fair-Issac used to do things in the dark ages...Nowadays, I think
that most credit scoring companies usually use a score between 0 and
1000. This score is usually the result of applying some kind of
monotonic transformation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (dennis roberts) writes:
> i know this is picky ... but, i say this is correct
Unfortunately, I believe the courts disagree with you. Intuitively
"unfair" software licences are common-place and it will not change
until people realise that they are not buying the *software* but
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, =?iso-8859-1?B?wMzB2L/1?= (June Rhee, apparently)
wrote:
> Hi, Donald.
> Thank you for your kind respond.
> My refined question is as follows:
>
> > Ambiguous question. By "beta" do you mean (as some would) a standardized
> > regression coefficient? Or do you mean (as s
12 matches
Mail list logo
