Robert J. MacG. Dawson wrote:
dennis roberts wrote:
robert ... i disagree ... now, if minitab will reimburse him for NOT
selling them ... that is a different story ... but, if they won't AND he
has not USED the project ... i see nothing to prevent him from obtaining a
return on his
Dear List(s),
Last week I have posted a request for help pertaining to the issue
of how to analyse repeated measurement data with some rather unusual
dimensions (N=120 subjects giving a time series with T=120 occassions
each). To my pleasure, there have been as much as 12 replies which are
Thom Baguley wrote:
Robert J. MacG. Dawson wrote:
dennis roberts wrote:
robert ... i disagree ... now, if minitab will reimburse him for NOT
selling them ... that is a different story ... but, if they won't AND he
has not USED the project ... i see nothing to prevent him from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Chris: That's not what Jerry means. What he's saying is that if
your sample size is large enough, a difference may be statistically
significant (a term which has a very precise meaning, especially to
the Apostles of the
Gale Bryce is right in saying that many popele have been involved with the
Undergrad Stat Ed Initiative, but I think all of us who have been involved
would agree that it has been Gale's energy, vision, flexibility and
follow-through that has led the way for the rest of us.
George
George W.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
dennis roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:06 PM 10/16/00 +, Peter Lewycky wrote:
It happens all the time in medicine. If I can show a p value 0.05 or
less the researchers are delighted. Whenever I can't produce a p of 0.05
or less they start looking for
Anyone have a macro or method of doing this with SAS. Or if someone
has the DYNASURV macro that the Univ of Munich used to distribute.
--
Ask those who
Ask those who
..
.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Hi all. I try to use the ratio between the sample averages of \mu and
\sigma to estimate the real ratio between \mu and \sigma. But I want to
know whether this estimator in any sense is optimum, and then is this one
the best estimator in Mean square estimation error sense?
Since the data are
Periodically there is a burst of discussion of hypothesis testing on
this list, often with quite a lot of verbal pyrotechnics. With the
current discussion going on, it seems an appropriate time to comment
that a few weeks ago I sent out a call for people interested in
presenting papers on
I can recommend the book "Bluff your way into Consultancy". While it appears
to be a joke at first sight, it in fact describe the reality of how the life
of most consultants. As a consultant you will get varied job from computing
the percentage of 2 numbers (it can create frustration for a boss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Most of the stuff being done are hyped-up hacks. They wouldn't dare publish
this junk lest someone with some knowledge tear it apart. ... The
mathematical/statistical validity of the technology
is really secondary at best."
If they haven't published their work, how do
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert J. MacG. Dawson) wrote:
Wrt to your example, it seems that the decision you are making about
practical importance is purely subjective.
What exactly do you mean by this? Are you saying that _my_
example is purely subjective
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: questions on hypothesis
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Chris: That's not what Jerry means. What he's saying is that if
your sample size is large enough, a
13 matches
Mail list logo
