- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: questions on hypothesis
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Chris: That's not what Jerry means. What he's saying is that if
> > your sample size is large enough,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert J. MacG. Dawson) wrote:
>
>
> > Wrt to your example, it seems that the decision you are making about
> > practical importance is purely subjective.
>
> What exactly do you mean by this? Are you saying that _my_
> example is purely s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Most of the stuff being done are hyped-up hacks. They wouldn't dare publish
this junk lest someone with some knowledge tear it apart. ... The
mathematical/statistical validity of the technology
is really secondary at best."
If they haven't published their work, how do yo
I can recommend the book "Bluff your way into Consultancy". While it appears
to be a joke at first sight, it in fact describe the reality of how the life
of most consultants. As a consultant you will get varied job from computing
the percentage of 2 numbers (it can create frustration for a boss if
Periodically there is a burst of discussion of hypothesis testing on
this list, often with quite a lot of verbal pyrotechnics. With the
current discussion going on, it seems an appropriate time to comment
that a few weeks ago I sent out a call for people interested in
presenting papers on Hypothes
Hi all. I try to use the ratio between the sample averages of \mu and
\sigma to estimate the real ratio between \mu and \sigma. But I want to
know whether this estimator in any sense is optimum, and then is this one
the best estimator in Mean square estimation error sense?
Since the data are s
Anyone have a macro or method of doing this with SAS. Or if someone
has the DYNASURV macro that the Univ of Munich used to distribute.
--
Ask those who
Ask those who
..
.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
=
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
dennis roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 10:06 PM 10/16/00 +, Peter Lewycky wrote:
>>It happens all the time in medicine. If I can show a p value 0.05 or
>>less the researchers are delighted. Whenever I can't produce a p of 0.05
>>or less they start looking
It seems like I read once that a characteristic of a Poisson arrival
pattern at a waiting line facility is that there will be long periods of
no or few arrivals followed by periods of many arrivals. Can anyone
refer me to a reference that discusses this characteristic(assuming it
is correct).
==
Gale Bryce is right in saying that many popele have been involved with the
Undergrad Stat Ed Initiative, but I think all of us who have been involved
would agree that it has been Gale's energy, vision, flexibility and
follow-through that has led the way for the rest of us.
George
George W. Co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Chris: That's not what Jerry means. What he's saying is that if
> > your sample size is large enough, a difference may be statistically
> > significant (a term which has a very precise meaning, especially to
> > the Apostles
Thom Baguley wrote:
>
> Robert J. MacG. Dawson wrote:
>
> > dennis roberts wrote:
> > >
> > > robert ... i disagree ... now, if minitab will reimburse him for NOT
> > > selling them ... that is a different story ... but, if they won't AND he
> > > has not USED the project ... i see nothing to
Dear List(s),
Last week I have posted a request for help pertaining to the issue
of how to analyse repeated measurement data with some rather unusual
dimensions (N=120 subjects giving a time series with T=120 occassions
each). To my pleasure, there have been as much as 12 replies which are
give
Robert J. MacG. Dawson wrote:
> dennis roberts wrote:
> >
> > robert ... i disagree ... now, if minitab will reimburse him for NOT
> > selling them ... that is a different story ... but, if they won't AND he
> > has not USED the project ... i see nothing to prevent him from obtaining a
> > return
14 matches
Mail list logo