Turns out the method I originally suggested is unnecessarily cumbersome.
A more elegant method is described below.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Donald Burrill wrote in part:
> COPY c1-c35 to c41-c75; # Always retain the original data
> OMIT c1 = '*';
> OMIT c2 = '*';
> . . .
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 00:34:40 GMT, "John Jackson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my solution using figures which are self-explanatory:
>
> Sample Size Determination
>
> pi = 50% central area 0.99
> confid level= 99%
Dear DL Students,
I have Ph.D. degree in mathematics, physics, electrical engineering,
computer science.
I render assistance for DL students in performing
assignments, theses, pfojects, courseworks, etc.
with detailed solutions descriptions.
Apply to me: you always get comprehensive help.
FIRST
Donald,
I totally agree w/your point about the stratification of the sample. My
facts were set up merely for simplicity's sake notwithstanding their clear
artificiality.
The only instances of multiple samples I have seen are in textbooks to prove
the CLT; that w/increasing numbers of sample mean
