HI
I am working in SPSS10. I have two groups research/ control with pre
and post data for each group. I want to use a sig test to check
whether any difference in progress between pre and post data between
research group and control is a sig difference. Currently I have the
all data in four separa
I am working with SPSS versio 10. I have two groups research and
control with pre and post data for each group. I want to compare the
progess of bot groups pre and post test.Does anyone knwo of a suitable
sig test and can you tell me how to apply it. Data is currently in
four files
Linda
===
In reviewing some not-yet-deleted email, I came across this one, and have
no record of its error(s) having been corrected.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, John Jackson wrote:
> How do describe the data that does not reside in the area
> described by the confidence interval?
>
> For example, you have a tw
On 29 Oct 2001 08:01:13 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dennis Roberts) wrote:
I have a Ph.D. in economics, equivalent of 3 semesters of calculus,
plus experience in stochastic calculus. Finally, took excellent
senior-level math stats sequence at NC State.
Matt.
>At 02:08 PM 10/29/01 +, Jason Ow
I'm looking for recommendations for recent books and papers on basic
techniques for exploratory data analysis.
Thanks,
SR Millis
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAG
Chia C Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:9rn4vc$8v2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> "Glen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > "Chia C Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:<9rjs94$lht$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > I have 2 var
In case somebody is willing to sell this software, please contact me
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Daniel
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
Glen Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9rndu1$gqq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9rndu1$gqq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'd probably suggest not trying to group the data and do a chi-squared
measure
> of association (you're throwing away the ordering, where most of the
information
> will be), exce
Donald Burrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Melady Preece wrote:
>
> > Hi. I want to compare the percentage of correct identifications (taste
> > test) to the percentage that would be correct by chance 50%? (only two
>
