There's a multiple comparison procedure called Games-Howell that is similar to the
Aspin-Welch-Satterthwaite statistic in that it has no assumption about variances.
-Original Message-
From: "Thomas Souers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:47:05 -0800
y about the ANOVA. Most MCP's don't require a significant F anyway. And if you have unequal n's, use Games-Howell's MCP to find where the differences are.
Cheers.
Lise
~~~
Lise DeShea, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Educational and Counseling Psychology Department
University of Kent
At 04:04 PM 9/12/01 -0400, you wrote:
if that is true ... then what benefit is there
to look at significance AT ALL
To get published, get tenure, and avoid having to live in a cardboard box
in the park. Ha ha!
Lise
up specifically to spam people.
You'll often get an automatic reply from the ISP's server, thanking you for the
report.
Lise DeShea, Ph.D.
University of Kentucky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Gordon D. Pusch" wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chike Ubah) writes:
>
> > ATTENTION:
&
try to reflect reality by allowing correlated factors?
(Of course, I too am revealing the bias of *my* training!)
Lise DeShea, Ph.D.
University of Kentucky
Educational/Counseling Psychology Dept.
245 Dickey Hall
Lexington KY 4
you have unequal sample sizes, you'd need to use the Games-Howell procedure.)
Cheers.
Lise DeShea (used to be L. Miller)
~~~
Lise DeShea, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Educational and Counseling Psychology
University of Ke
enormous power yet a
small effect size. A p-value by itself doesn't say much.
Lise DeShea, Ph.D.
Educational and Counseling Psychology
University of Kentucky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this li
nd I am dissatisfied with it.
As I am new to this list, I searched the edstat archives and looked at
messages dating back as much as four years, and I couldn't find any
previous notes that apply to my situation. Any textbook suggestions
would be much appreciated. Thanks, & cheers.
L
