[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Most of the stuff being done are hyped-up hacks. They wouldn't dare publish
this junk lest someone with some knowledge tear it apart. ... The
mathematical/statistical validity of the technology
is really secondary at best."
If they haven't published their work, how do you know that it is "secondary
at best"?
Will Dwinnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
