In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich Ulrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|> "With 10,000 no-punches where only half that many no-votes should be
|> expected (in Palm Beach County), they re-counted a 1% sample and came
|> up with 47 additional votes -- about half of the 100 or so that were
|> possi
In addition to being unable to spell "fallacy," I
can't do arithmetic. Chung is right. The formula
is 28000*0.24*V, which is 672 for V=0.1.
It might be better to add a multiplicative
parameter to remove from the 28000 the genuine "no
vote" totals. Thus one has 28000*H*0.24*V, from
which one can g
