On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 15:53:58 GMT, "Robert Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>In today's edition of the NY Times was this article on the accuracy of
>machine vs. hand counts as described by the makers of vote-counting
>machines.
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/17/politics/17MACH.html
>
>In summa
In today's edition of the NY Times was this article on the accuracy of
machine vs. hand counts as described by the makers of vote-counting
machines.
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/17/politics/17MACH.html
In summary, under ideal conditions the machines can be up to
99.99% accurate. Ideal conditio
