On 18 Oct 2000, Karl L. Wuensch wrote:
> I suggest that we not use the phrase "LSD" to describe the "protected t
> test," or "Fisher's procedure" (the procedure that requires having first
> obtained a significant omnibus ANOVA effect). After all, one can compute a
> "least significant difference
I suggest that we not use the phrase "LSD" to describe the "protected t
test," or "Fisher's procedure" (the procedure that requires having first
obtained a significant omnibus ANOVA effect). After all, one can compute a
"least significant difference" (between means to be "significant" at an
adjus
Bruce Weaver wrote:
> 1. There is at least one discipline out there in which a bunch of
> > Bonferroni t-tests ARE known as the LSD approach.
> >
> > 2. The authors are in error.
> >
> > Comments, anyone?
> >
> > --
Very odd. I'd lean to 2. I've only ever come across LSD as t tests following
