In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
dennis roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 02:22 PM 8/22/00 -0500, Herman Rubin wrote:
>>No geographer would take the heights of mountains and
>>convert them to a probability scale.
>i beg to differ ... for, it is not totally an uninteresting question that
>s
At 02:22 PM 8/22/00 -0500, Herman Rubin wrote:
>No geographer would take the heights of mountains and
>convert them to a probability scale.
i beg to differ ... for, it is not totally an uninteresting question that
someone might ask ... for all mountains ... what is the p value for
selecting a
In article <41890A69A4EAD211A74600805F9F86F90276@ESC-S1>,
Olsen, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Herman and All --
>> On the other hand, the type of clear measurements and
>> formulation in these fields are not generally available
>> in psychology. So they make the massive mistake of
>>
Herman and All --
>
> On the other hand, the type of clear measurements and
> formulation in these fields are not generally available
> in psychology. So they make the massive mistake of
> letting statistics do their thinking for them. A typical
> example of this is to convert their data to n
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Donald Burrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, dennis roberts wrote in part:
>> why don't students get scared blue with intro psy ... or intro geography?
>With respect to psych: Because they haven't yet found out what John
>Kemeny wrote about ps
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, dennis roberts wrote in part:
> why don't students get scared blue with intro psy ... or intro geography?
With respect to psych: Because they haven't yet found out what John
Kemeny wrote about psychology 40 years ago: The only reason psych
students don't have to do more
