Re: When *must* use weighted LS?

2000-03-21 Thread Michael Cohen
In sci.stat.edu John Hendrickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] : There is also some debate on using weights for stratified sampling and/or : to correct for sampling bias. Weighting leads to correct estimates but : incorrect standard errors. Weights often get blamed for things that are not t

Re: When *must* use weighted LS?

2000-03-15 Thread Joe Ward
index.html   *           - Original Message - From: John Hendrickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 1:22 AM Subject: Re: When *must* use weighted LS? | In article <8am7d1$hqj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">8am7d1$hqj$[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: When *must* use weighted LS?

2000-03-15 Thread John Hendrickx
In article <8am7d1$hqj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > > I think I made the formulation too wordy in previous > post. > > Let me try this simple question: > > When one wishes to do a (multi)linear regression on a set of > observed data, and one is in the (unusual) position o

Re: When *must* use weighted LS?

2000-03-14 Thread Rich Ulrich
On 14 Mar 2000 20:28:17 GMT, Ron Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think I made the formulation too wordy in previous > post. > > Let me try this simple question: > > When one wishes to do a (multi)linear regression on a set of > observed data, and one is in the (unusual) position of p

When *must* use weighted LS?

2000-03-14 Thread Ron Bloom
I think I made the formulation too wordy in previous post. Let me try this simple question: When one wishes to do a (multi)linear regression on a set of observed data, and one is in the (unusual) position of possessing a set of sample standard deviations (of varying degrees of f.) at each v