In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
San <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When we analyze data which we ought to know whether the difference of
>mean between two populations isn't equal to zero, which method will
>generally be better? hypothesis or confidence interval?
Neither is the appropriate thing to
Why? How does it work out?
Jerry Dallal wrote:
>
> San wrote:
> >
> > When we analyze data which we ought to know whether the difference of
> > mean between two populations isn't equal to zero, which method will
> > generally be better? hypothesis or confidence interval?
>
> Confidence interval
San wrote:
>
> When we analyze data which we ought to know whether the difference of
> mean between two populations isn't equal to zero, which method will
> generally be better? hypothesis or confidence interval?
Confidence interval.
When we analyze data which we ought to know whether the difference of
mean between two populations isn't equal to zero, which method will
generally be better? hypothesis or confidence interval?
Or confidence interval is just a kind of substitue for hypothesis when
we are dealing with problems like
