Re: within group agreement for nominal/ordinal data

2000-08-28 Thread Donald Burrill
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Ken Reed wrote in part: KR> > One variable has 4 categories (agree-neutral-disagree, don't know). > > DB> Are you trying to say that you have one such variable, and your other > > variables are otherwise described; or that you have a number of such > > variables and you want

Re: within group agreement for nominal/ordinal data

2000-08-25 Thread Steve Gregorich
Its not optimal to think about this as analogous to a fixed-effects ANOVA with 2000 levels of the explanatory. Rather, a random-effects model is the better approach. The described application boils down to a nominal logistic regression variance components model. Workplaces are random. The

Re: within group agreement for nominal/ordinal data

2000-08-23 Thread Ken Reed
Donald Burrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Clarification(s), please: > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Ken Reed wrote: > > > I'm trying to test whether a variable measures a group-level property, > > and so I'm looking for an analog to eta-squared, i

Re: within group agreement for nominal/ordinal data

2000-08-23 Thread Donald Burrill
Clarification(s), please: On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Ken Reed wrote: > I'm trying to test whether a variable measures a group-level property, > and so I'm looking for an analog to eta-squared, intra-class correlation > etc for nominal or ordinal data. Do you have a particular group-level property i

within group agreement for nominal/ordinal data

2000-08-22 Thread Ken Reed
I'm trying to test whether a variable measures a group-level property, and so I'm looking for an analog to eta-squared, intra-class correlation etc for nominal or ordinal data. I have data comprising 2000 workplaces, within samples of individuals drawn from each (n=20,000). One variable has 4 ca