Alan McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> Rich Ulrich wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:26:46 +0900, "rjkim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > hi, all.
> > >
> > > Isn't a chi-squre test inherently a 'one-sided sig. test'?
> >
>
Dear all:
Is anybody aware of a sample size or power calculation for a continuous
trait in gene-gene or gene-environment interaction in the literature?
Thanks a lot,
Jisheng.
Jisheng Cui, Ph.D
Research Fellow
Centre for Genetic Epidemiology
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But Excel CAN produce simple scatter plots or bar charts. It is just that
> the defaults are so horrible. With a lot of tweaking you can make them
> My problem is cost. I want to get everyone in my department to have the
> facility to produce reasonable charts that h
Hi,
We are using a program called Fidap to do multiple regression on
neuroimaging data. The problem is nobody here or where the program came
from understands how to select coefficients, ie., whether and how to make
them orthogonal. I am not very sophisticated statistically, but can muddle
through
In article <95nuk5$8df$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks very much for your helpful response.
> 1) My factors are continous. I have multiple responses. Some are
> continous and some are categorical. I need to optimize my resonses.
> The main region that they are interested i
Hi
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Thom Baguley wrote:
> Donald Burrill wrote:
> > Well, it _might_ be. Depends on what hypothesis was being tested,
> > doesn't it? And so far "rjkim" hasn't deigned to tell us that.
>
> Yes, though I think the vocabulary can obscure what goes on. To me a
> "one-tailed" te
No long term contract
No activation fee
No big prepayment of airtime
No credit check
PAGING AMERICA is going to give you absolutely Free the Brand new Motorola
Accessmate E-Mail display pager. This is the top of the line PCS technology
pager made today. This side viewable dis
Bob Wheeler wrote:
> Your point is a good one, but as a side issue, let
> me object to the word "fudged." It implies
> chicanery, which is not something that even Fisher
> cared to imply. No one will ever know why Mendel's
> results appear as they do, but It was not
> necessarily with an intent
At 08:50 AM 2/2/01 -0500, Herman Rubin wrote:
>
>But this is not the case with fixing a p value. Most
>testing problems have the property that the appropriate
>procedure to be used corresponds to a p value for that
>problem AND THAT SAMPLE SIZE, but the p value to be used
>depends quite substanti
Incorrectly? Would you please expand your thought.
The only thing that might be called an error in
his laws, that comes immediately to mind, is the
fact that he didn't allow for the small problem of
two genes being on the same chromosome -- but then
he didn't know about chromosomes. Is this what y
Donald Burrill wrote:
> Well, it _might_ be. Depends on what hypothesis was being tested,
> doesn't it? And so far "rjkim" hasn't deigned to tell us that.
Yes, though I think the vocabulary can obscure what goes on. To me a
"one-tailed" test should refer to the distribution to retain the meanin
Rich Strauss wrote:
>
> Your point is well taken, and I didn't mean to imply dishonesty either --
> the term "fudged" was a poor choice, but I meant it in the sense of
> manipulation or filtering, not necessarily conscious, and I mentioned that
> it was an assertion.
I don't see any re
Caroline Brown wrote:
>
> HI
>
> I have an analysis problem, which I am researching solutions to, and David
> Howell of UVM suggested I mail the query to you.
> My problem is how to deal with a two way- repeated measures design,
> in which one cell could not be measured:
>A1 A2 A3
> B1 ok
In article ,
Alan Miller wrote:
>Kumara Sastry wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>Suppose, X ~ Binomial(n1,p1), Y~Binomial(n2,p2) , and X and Y are
>>independent. Also, Z = X+Y. Can anyone please comment on what the pdf
>>of Z is?
>>Thanks
>>Kumara
>Pr(Z
14 matches
Mail list logo