you might want to go to http://www.pitt.edu/~csna/
and then cross-post your question to CLASS-L
The Classification Society meeting this weekend had a lot of discussion of
these topics.
My first question is whether you intend to interpret the clusters?
If so, what is the nature of the 500
The only time I can think of this being meaningful is in determining what size
sample to draw. If we don't have any prior information about what the
proportion of events in a population have a particular characteristic (the
probability of a characteristic), then we assume the worse-case (widest
I concur. It doesn't make sense as it stands.
Was one of the factors between subjects and one within subjects?
If that is so, the df for the interaction effect would be more than for the
between subjects factor.
Assuming the the 2 level factor was a between subjects factor, subjects would
be
In my experience, students benefit from the individual and group _production_ of
summaries, syndicate notes, and cheat sheets.
Reviewing the summaries produced by students gives a teacher feedback on what is
or is not understood, and whether the relative emphasis of the lessons _as
received_ is
