Re: Excel Graphics

2001-02-08 Thread Robert J. MacG. Dawson
Jay Warner wrote: > Anything in .gif files will not print well - plan on it, and cheer for > exceptions. these are usually 72 dpi resolution, which looks good > only on your semi-friendly computer screen. Good screens show the > difference, too. _Almost_ anything in GIF files will no

Re: Excel Graphics

2001-02-07 Thread Jay Warner
Robert J. MacG. Dawson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">David Duffy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:But Excel CAN produce simple scatter plots or bar charts. It is just thatthe defaults are so horrible. With a lot of tweaking you can make themMy problem is cost. I want to get everyone in my department to

Re: Excel Graphics

2001-02-07 Thread myotis
David, Thanks for the suggestion, I wasn't aware that GNUPlot was available as a WIN32 option. In practice I've found that people need and easy solution, and for most, switching the data to R or GNUPlot would be more work than tweaking Excel and would rebel at such a suggestion. However, for

Re: Excel Graphics

2001-02-07 Thread Robert J. MacG. Dawson
David Duffy wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But Excel CAN produce simple scatter plots or bar charts. It is just that > > the defaults are so horrible. With a lot of tweaking you can make them > > > My problem is cost. I want to get everyone in my department to have the > > facility to

Re: Excel Graphics

2001-02-06 Thread David Duffy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But Excel CAN produce simple scatter plots or bar charts. It is just that > the defaults are so horrible. With a lot of tweaking you can make them > My problem is cost. I want to get everyone in my department to have the > facility to produce reasonable charts that h