On 23 Mar 2001 02:53:11 GMT, John Uebersax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Paul's comment is very apt. It is very important to consider whether
> a consistent error should or should not count against reliability.
> In some cases, a constant positive or negative bias should not matter.
- If you ha
Paul's comment is very apt. It is very important to consider whether
a consistent error should or should not count against reliability.
In some cases, a constant positive or negative bias should not matter.
For example, one might be willing to standardize each measure before
using it in statistic
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:23:54 -0500, Bruce Weaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 21 Mar 2001, Awahab El-Naggar wrote:
>
> > Dear Colleagues
> > I have been using "test-retest" method for calculating reliability by
> > applying the Pearson Product
