A bit of a windy road:
starting, as usual, with the personal frame of reference
PyGeo's current implementation supports the exploration of the geometry
of complex numbers, and therefore speaks Mobius transformations.
http://pygeo.sourceforge.net
now has a pretty picture of a simple
Maybe a tightening spam filter is to blame.
In any case, I'm resubscribing from my Gmail account.
As a Qwest user, I'm used to being discriminated against, thanks to the activities of my fellow Qwestians.
My next post will be back to business.
Kirby
Hi. This is the qmail-send program
Today was my 4th session in a sequence of nine.
I think the way it's developing for me is I hand out worksheets, which
pose questions around Python, and students have the option to just fill
them in, knowing Python in their heads well enough to not consult the
actual interpreter. Others run the
Scott David Daniels wrote:
Well, in fact both meanings of fixed point are used, seldom by the
same person. I expect Knuth is in that small group that uses both
meanings regularly (since his basic training was all mathematics).
Look to the functional programming people for examination of the
Arthur wrote:
re: The study of fixed points has been at the foundation of algorithms
I guess what I am asking further is whether the statement is simply
referencing the development of algorithms for solving the mathematical
question of the fixed points of a function, in the context of
Grégoire Dooms wrote:
Very deep in the foundations of algorithms are the foundations of
computer science semantics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denotational_semantics
An other area where I've been exposed ot fixed points is concurrent
constraint programming where constraint propagators
