Re: [Edu-sig] Properties use case

2006-03-25 Thread Laura Creighton
In a message of Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:02:31 EST, Arthur writes: It doesn't matter to me any more than whether my tax calculations are consistently correct were my class the one you described a few posts back . I think I should perhaps appreciate that Kirby is the only one talking straight to me.

Re: [Edu-sig] Properties use case

2006-03-25 Thread Arthur
-Original Message- From: Laura Creighton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:16 AM To: Arthur Ok, so it does matter. Are you locking your complex number before modifying it? Just to generalize the issue, so that I know, realy, what we are talking about,

Re: [Edu-sig] Properties use case

2006-03-25 Thread Chuck Allison
I think they are going on about a very fundamental CS issue: mutable objects are not thread-safe. If threads are not an issue, then this has all been hot air, but it came up, IIRC, because the discussion mentioned the mutable vs. immutable issue, and this always leads one to concurrency nowadays,

Re: [Edu-sig] Properties use case

2006-03-25 Thread Arthur
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Tobis Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 10:21 AM To: edu-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Properties use case Arthur (addressing you directly) does your code use any threading

[Edu-sig] FW: Properties use case

2006-03-25 Thread Arthur
My response to something Grégoire sent me this off-list is below. My off-list response to him bounced. I see no reason why he would mind me posted it up so I take the liberty to do so. Apologies if Grégoire feels otherwise. Not something I generally like to do, but see no reason in this case