On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:59:26 +1100 (EST), Darren Payne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pair programming is fine and works best when both are
of equal ability. I would encourage you to avoid
putting a stronger / more able person with a weaker /
less able person - the stronger one will get very
little
How to assign the pairs has also been a question on my mind, so I am
very glad this came up.
Pair programming is fine and works best when both are
of equal ability.
...
* students with the top two grades are partners, next two, next two, and so on
* Highest grade gets to pick partner from the
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:02:15 +0200, Linda Grandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if letting the students pair up for themselves could work? That
would more or less be a variant of the second alternative above. Or does
this introduce the risk of weaker students pairing up with strong
Lloyd Hugh Allen wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:02:15 +0200, Linda Grandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if letting the students pair up for themselves could work? That
would more or less be a variant of the second alternative above. Or does
this introduce the risk of weaker students pairing
9. Best approach to teaching OOP and graphics
(Linda Grandell)
I too taught Java and Python to 2 separate classes 2
years ago. Funny, the more Java I taught the less I
liked it ... but then you get over it and just put up
with Java's ways, plus loads of ppl have coded modules
to get around