for them.
Nancy Ruzycki
-Original Message-
From: edu-sig-bounces+njruzycki=seattleschools@python.org on behalf of
kirby urner
Sent: Tue 1/12/2010 7:59 PM
To: edu-sig@python.org
Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Edu-sig page advice to teachers
[ thread moved to edu-sig ]
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Andre Roberge andre.robe...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, here's the revised version (please feel free to suggest changes):
I think your new verbiage is well crafted. I understand what you mean about
why people unfamiliar with Python might want to start with 2.6 /
[ thread moved to edu-sig ]
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Maria Droujkova droujk...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of my kids are about to start using Python for our Physics and
Modeling, up from Scratch. I am scared to death and still have not selected
a version for them. All of them run Windows
kirby urner wrote:
I'm wondering if this should be fine tuned to more explicitly
encourage 2.6 and above if doing Python 2 (because of
3rd party dependencies), 3.x in all other cases.
+1
An appropriate topic for discussion though. What 3rd
party libraries would break? I'm big into VPython,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Vern Ceder vce...@canterburyschool.org wrote:
kirby urner wrote:
I'm wondering if this should be fine tuned to more explicitly
encourage 2.6 and above if doing Python 2 (because of
3rd party dependencies), 3.x in all other cases.
+1
2.6 has the new format
Current verbiage:
As a result of the changes, programs written for Python 2 are likely
to be incompatible with Python 3 (and vice-versa). Since both versions
are going to co-exist for a while, a choice has to be made as to which
one to use. As a very subjective opinion, we would like to offer
