[Edu-sig] Fwd: Do we "teach computers" when we write code?

2009-04-07 Thread Lloyd Hugh Allen
I haven't posted in a while -- forgot to reply-to-edu-sig :) -- Forwarded message -- From: Lloyd Hugh Allen Date: Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 09:26 Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Do we "teach computers" when we write code? To: kirby urner As a math teacher, using the particular example of sum

Re: [Edu-sig] Fwd: Do we "teach computers" when we write code?

2009-04-07 Thread kirby urner
Yes sir, exactly. I believe that in calling computers "stupid", other epithets, we're asserting our aggressive primate dominance over these gray boxy things that in some science fiction have beamed aboard spaceship earth in order to steal our jobs or something, because they're smarter than we are.

Re: [Edu-sig] Fwd: Do we "teach computers" when we write code?

2009-04-07 Thread kirby urner
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Lloyd Hugh Allen wrote: > I haven't posted in a while -- forgot to reply-to-edu-sig :) > > I replied but to an earlier part of this thread -- I trust our human readers to make the connections. :) Kirby ___ Edu-sig maili

Re: [Edu-sig] Fwd: Do we "teach computers" when we write code?

2009-04-07 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Lloyd Hugh Allen wrote: > I haven't posted in a while -- forgot to reply-to-edu-sig :) There is a long-running rwar between those who think that mailing lists should have a reply-to set to the mailing list address, and those who think that replies should go to the

Re: [Edu-sig] Fwd: Do we "teach computers" when we write code?

2009-04-07 Thread Laura Creighton
In a message of Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:09:36 PDT, Edward Cherlin writes: >There is a long-running rwar between those who think that mailing >lists should have a reply-to set to the mailing list address, and >those who think that replies should go to the previous sender by >default. Is it worse that mi