I should have changed the subject line. More on the funding story:
http://news.dice.com/2013/02/06/continuum-analytics-using-darpa-funds-to-explore-python/ EU funding for PyPy: http://conferences.agilealliance.org/sessions/20060356 Then there's trying to get funding to have NumPy support PyPy or vice versa: http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/10/numpy-funding-and-status-update.html Kirby On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM, kirby urner <kirby.ur...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Laura Creighton <l...@openend.se> wrote: > >> >In sketching out the Python ecosystem in broad brush terms, is it fair to >> >say NumPy gets a lot of US investment whereas PyPy is more an EU pet >> >project? Or is that too broad brush? >> >> Too broad. In investment terms, PyPy gets from _everywhere_, >> including lots from the USA. But PyPy core contributors are still >> mostly from not-in-the-USA ... unless things have changed in the last >> 6 months while I have been busy elsewhere. >> >> Laura >> >> > OK. I was partly asking because I know the US government is putting funds > directly into Blaze: > > http://continuum.io/blog/blaze > > I don't know if the US government itself directly pays for PyPy > development, but my impression is the EU itself does. > > Kirby > >
_______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig