On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Scott Balneaves
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:57:31PM -0800, john wrote:
>
>> I just got to wondering (in an idle sort of way) why applications like
>> openoffice which is so much bigger than firefox seem to run just fine
>> with 24 copies open and firefox d
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:43:26AM -0800, john wrote:
> That's a pretty damning indictment. So is supporting gnash someway the
> direction forward in your opinion? Or some other approach?
Well, since you *asked* :)
1) First and foremost, we, as a (I dunno what you'd call us) "the viewing
public"
Hi Gavin,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
>
> The number of documents which OpenOffice users would have which has >50
> images, several of which are probably animated as well as an embedded
> video or flash applet, is probably quite small.
>
> I might be wrong but, I'd gu
Hey Scott,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Scott Balneaves
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:57:31PM -0800, john wrote:
> Well, I think firefox will too. Here's a test: get your 24 students to JUST
> browse around on a site that doesn't involve any Java, or flash. Something
> like wikipedia
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:57:31PM -0800, john wrote:
> I just got to wondering (in an idle sort of way) why applications like
> openoffice which is so much bigger than firefox seem to run just fine
> with 24 copies open and firefox doesn't?
Well, I think firefox will too. Here's a test: get yo
Hi john
john wrote:
> Thanks in advance for your ideas!
I am personally also quite frustrated with Firefox performance issues-
and that's just on a standalone machine. I installed Chromium from the
daily build PPA's and it's shaping up very nicely. Performance-wise it's
definitely better than Fir
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, john wrote:
> I just got to wondering (in an idle sort of way) why applications like
> openoffice which is so much bigger than firefox seem to run just fine
> with 24 copies open and firefox doesn't?
I'd say it's down to the complexity and number of documents that the
LTSP goals for Lucid
Dallas time: 17.11 10.00 (UTC/GMT -6 hours)
Check your local time:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=70
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-lucid-ltsp
http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-l/lone1/
Audio:
http://icecast.ubuntu.com:8000/s
