Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
In services.cpp, ~ServiceCore executes pop_back(), and this function
calls the destructor of the element
(http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/list/pop_back.html).
However, the refcount of the objects so
Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 18:26 +0100, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
In services.cpp, ~ServiceCore executes pop_back(), and this function
calls the destructor of the element
Damien Sandras wrote:
Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 18:26 +0100, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
In services.cpp, ~ServiceCore executes pop_back(), and this function
calls the destructor of the element
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
In services.cpp, ~ServiceCore executes pop_back(), and this function
calls the destructor of the element
(http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/list/pop_back.html). However,
the refcount of the objects so deleted is not necessarily 0 (you can
print
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
In services.cpp, ~ServiceCore executes pop_back(), and this function
calls the destructor of the element
(http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/list/pop_back.html).
However, the refcount of the objects so deleted is not
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
Julien Puydt wrote:
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
In services.cpp, ~ServiceCore executes pop_back(), and this function
calls the destructor of the element
(http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/list/pop_back.html).
However, the refcount of the objects so
Eugen Dedu a écrit :
In services.cpp, ~ServiceCore executes pop_back(), and this function
calls the destructor of the element
(http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/list/pop_back.html). However,
the refcount of the objects so deleted is not necessarily 0 (you can
print their refcount just
