On 10/25/2010 07:38 PM, Stuart Gathman wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:26:40 +0200
Eugen Dedu<eugen.d...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr> wrote:
Send us the whole conversation (REGISTER and 606 answer I suppose).
Source: 86.64.162.35 (86.64.162.35)
Destination: 192.168.1.105 (192.168.1.105)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: sip (5060), Dst Port: sip (5060)
Source port: sip (5060)
Destination port: sip (5060)
Length: 460
Checksum: 0x45c1 [validation disabled]
[Good Checksum: False]
[Bad Checksum: False]
Session Initiation Protocol
Status-Line: SIP/2.0 606 Not Acceptable
Status-Code: 606
[Resent Packet: False]
[Request Frame: 122]
[Response Time (ms): 95]
Message Header
CSeq: 8 REGISTER
Sequence Number: 8
Method: REGISTER
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.10.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf83e1be0-3ade-df11-9109-0017c410a448;rport=5060;received=72.209.xxx.xxx
How did that 192.168.10.6 get in there? That is probably what ekiga.net
is complaining about? It is certainly not in the REGISTER packet.
_______________________________________________
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list