Re: [Ekiga-list] Running Multiple Computers with Ekiga behind same NAT firewall

2011-05-25 Thread Paul Jones
On 05/25/2011 02:17 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote: > On 25/05/11 20:07, Paul Jones wrote: >> On 05/25/2011 12:42 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote: >>> On 24/05/11 20:23, Paul Jones wrote: >>>> On 05/24/2011 08:16 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote: >>>>> On 24/05/11 07:25, Dave Koelmeye

Re: [Ekiga-list] Running Multiple Computers with Ekiga behind same NAT firewall

2011-05-25 Thread Paul Jones
On 05/25/2011 12:42 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote: > On 24/05/11 20:23, Paul Jones wrote: >> On 05/24/2011 08:16 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote: >>> On 24/05/11 07:25, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 24 May, 2011,at 03:12 PM, Paul Jones >>&g

Re: [Ekiga-list] Running Multiple Computers with Ekiga behind same NAT firewall

2011-05-25 Thread Paul Jones
Oh sorry, yes, it is 3.2.7. Machine 1 is debian squeeze on 32 bit and machine 2 is debian Sid on 64 bit. PJ I may have taken ekiga from Sid on the squeeze machine but that shouldn't matter here. On May 24, 2011, at 15:10, Eugen Dedu wrote: > On 24/05/11 20:23, Paul Jones wrote: >

Re: [Ekiga-list] Running Multiple Computers with Ekiga behind same NAT firewall

2011-05-24 Thread Paul Jones
On 05/24/2011 03:10 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote: > On 24/05/11 20:23, Paul Jones wrote: >> On 05/24/2011 08:16 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote: >>> On 24/05/11 07:25, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 24 May, 2011,at 03:12 PM, Paul Jones >>&g

Re: [Ekiga-list] Running Multiple Computers with Ekiga behind same NAT firewall

2011-05-24 Thread Paul Jones
On 05/24/2011 08:16 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote: > On 24/05/11 07:25, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: >> >> >> On 24 May, 2011,at 03:12 PM, Paul Jones wrote: >> >>> Hi, new to list and to Ekiga and SIP in general. >>> >>> Basically, I'm asking if run

[Ekiga-list] Running Multiple Computers with Ekiga behind same NAT firewall

2011-05-23 Thread Paul Jones
Hi, new to list and to Ekiga and SIP in general. Basically, I'm asking if running multiple computers with Ekiga behind the same NAT firewall, and each machine will be a different user with a different user account. Basically, the way I'm trying to do it is by specifying a port other than 5060 for