Hi Costin,
my query looks like this:
POST _search
{
query: {
filtered: {
query: {
match_all: {}
},
filter: {
bool: {
must_not: [
{
terms: {
And another one thing,
I was misunderstanding, ES can't parallel work with another repository such
like MySQL. I mean ES can't keep index pointer in itself, and index data in
MySQL.
All searching process must be done in ES.
The only way improving performane seems like adding more machines,
Hi asit, can you please share me your email id ? My company has been using
cassandra but not efficiently so i am looking for similar impletation if
they are successful so would like to know your experience
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 18:06:58 UTC+5:30, Asit Kaushik wrote:
Hi All,
We are
Hi Jorg/Nik,
I tried the scenario like one with storing all fields and one without. So
what i came across is
-- The size of index is reduced as mentioned in preceding posts as well
-- Search time for same query is slightly less with not storing the
individual field
-- But here I am getting an
Hi Andrej,
Thanks a lot for your kindly help. It's really give me a big progress.
PS: I also found that QueryBuilders.wrapperQuery(String DSL) can do the
same
work.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25859921/how-to-construct-querybuilder-from-json-dsl-when-using-java-api-in-elasticsearch
You must store the field for highlighting.
Jörg
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Prashant Agrawal
prashant.agra...@paladion.net wrote:
Hi Jorg/Nik,
I tried the scenario like one with storing all fields and one without. So
what i came across is
-- The size of index is reduced as mentioned
I opened issue #7836:
https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/7836.
On Monday, September 22, 2014 9:27:47 PM UTC-7, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi,
It sounds like every single ES deployment out there suffers from this, or
am I missing something? Is there an ES issue where this
Hi Ankush,
A few weeks ago I released an ElasticSearch plugin that allows you to
override the default word boundary properties for Unicode characters as
implemented by the StandardTokenizer algorithm. I had the same issue where
I wanted to use the StandardTokenizer but override the word
Thanks Mark, I thought so. But just in case I'll try to lower heap size
from 16G to 10G to see if it will help or worsen the situation.
On Monday, September 22, 2014 5:43:38 PM UTC-4, Mark Walkom wrote:
I don't think it's anything you should be overly worried about as GC is
normal.
I am
Otis, from what I understand, the default size for the cache is unbounded,
so cache eviction should not occur due to inconsistent range checks in the
default case.
--
Ivan
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It sounds like every single ES
Hi,
Here is something worth sharing, I think. For Logsene
http://sematext.com/logsene/, We've been trying out EC2 R3 instances
(specifically r3.large) with Elasticsearch (1.1.x and 1.3.x including
1.3.2) with the latest Java 7 update 67. We tried this on Ubuntu 14.04
AMI, as well as Amazon
Hi,
We aggregate outside of ES, in memory, and push in bulk. We could still
roll up the data stored in ES later on if we wanted to, but reading from ES
could get expensive.
Otis
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr Elasticsearch Support *
Indeed, only instances with a value (greater than 0) specified for
indices.fielddata.cache.size are affected. This is what triggers the use of
Guava's eviction-based-on-size feature[1]
Philippe
[1]
Thanks, Felipe.
Problem reproduced and solution discovered. Please track
https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/7840 for progress.
On Monday, September 22, 2014 9:59:49 PM UTC+1, Felipe Hummel wrote:
Hi Mark, I've created isolated mains for Java and Scala:
Thanks Mark, glad I could help.
In the meantime, is there any workaround to force the module to be load
(without recompiling a ES .jar)?
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Harwood
mark.harw...@elasticsearch.com wrote:
Thanks, Felipe.
Problem reproduced and solution discovered. Please
Hi,
I would like to get the following result, but cant seem to find a solution:
I have an index with a field which has f.i the value: laptop
I have a synonym filter which maps laptop to notebook
This all works fine, but what i would like is to show the user 'notebook'
as autcomplete suggestion
I feel grubby even suggesting this...
https://gist.github.com/markharwood/0cecd5019dbd5c4e90fc
but it looks to work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
elasticsearch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
Hello Henrik,
My guess would be that the timeouts you are seeing in python are
causing this - when the python client encounters a timeout, it retries
the request, thinking something went wrong. Thus if your timeout is
too small it can actually lead to spamming the cluster - when the
python client
I have a node app using the javascript api.
even the the query returns a hit. I get the following response
hits: {
total: 1,
max_score: 14.627042,
hits: []
}
how can the hits array be empty when the total shows 1.. If I run the query
in sense I get the expected
This is a bug in lucene: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5975
Sorry it took a while, thanks for reporting this!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Wei ws...@groupon.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm working on an ES upgrade from v0.20.5 to v1.2.1
I tested in a 2 node cluster, 3 indices, ~4
I did a quick search but couldn't find anything on this topic.
We have a parent/child/grandchild relationship and our system has a dynamic
number of parent mappings, but our child/grandchild mappings have a strict
schema. This is because the data in the parent mapping is undefined and
user
21 matches
Mail list logo