Quick update,
As much for myself or if anybody else comes across this problem in the future.
We moved both master and query nodes to use 70% of our calculated
'usable_memory'.
Things seem stable now.
We are still concerned about being able to maximize java heap size on our query
(aka
Michael,
If the value is being parsed into separate words, just try using the
FIELD.raw version instead,
Best,
LM
On Friday, October 17, 2014 9:54:40 PM UTC+2, Michael Irwin wrote:
I'm using Kibana w/ logstash to view web server logs. I'd like to add a
graph that displays uniques of the
Hi,
if I understand correctly, seems it should be possible to use
SimpleRequest over TransportClient, is this correct?
I couldn't get it to work using:
Client client = new TransportClient().addTransportAddress(new
InetSocketTransportAddress(localhost, 9300));
but when switched to node client,
Thanks guys for your responses.
My question was due an strange behavior when using 'not' and 'geo_distance'
filters.
I want to filter some results that have undesirable words, such as 'sex',
'xxx', etc... And then geo filter those good results, but if I place 'not'
filter first, then when geo
Hi All,
I currently am planning on building out to a 4 Elasticsearch data node
cluster from currently at 2 and have a question regarding how many shards
to use for the indexes. I am running the ELK stack and currently each index
file, one per day, is creating 5 shards per node. As you can
That's what I needed. Thanks!
--
Mike
On 2014-10-18, Lorenzo Mangani wrote:
Michael,
If the value is being parsed into separate words, just try using the
FIELD.raw version instead,
Best,
LM
On Friday, October 17, 2014 9:54:40 PM UTC+2, Michael Irwin wrote:
I'm using Kibana
Is there some reason why your Elasticsearch nodes cannot serve as both
master and data? I believe that dedicated master nodes should only come
into play with large clusters, way beyond the 3 you have. If your master
nodes are tied to your app nodes, then I believe you will have less
resiliency
The structure of your query is odd. Either it is some format that I am not
aware of or the Elasticsearch parser is not doing a good job at determining
it is invalid.
Your two filters should be joined via a bool filter. Sometime like (not
tested):
{
query: {
filtered: {
query: {
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Grégoire Seux
kamaradclim...@gmail.com wrote:
- are awareness and filtering supposed to cooperate?
A quick look at the code confirm that allocation deciders are fully orthogonal.
Should I open a github issue to discuss adding support for cooperating
deciders ?
The number of shards will help you scale out in case you add more nodes in
the future. With your current shard count at 5, you cannot optimally deploy
and distribute a 6+ node cluster. However, your data is time-based, one per
day. Are queries on historical data important? I would start off with a
Jorg,
That is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for.
I'm having a little bit of difficulty getting it to do what I want.
I want to push an index to another index and change the mapping.
I can import / export okay but the push is having difficulty picking up the
new mappings.
The syntax
Hi,
I can't figure out why Elasticsearch still can't be reached from the public
ip of the ec2 instance. This is my config file
cloud.aws.access_key: AKIAXPWEW2A
cloud.aws.secret_key: EvU0I5Xx+b+FlRXXXSSDFfM2Z
plugin.mandatory: cloud-aws
cluster.name: escluster
node.name:
12 matches
Mail list logo