No. Which copy of the shard is the replica and which is the slave can change
all the time. Most actions take almost the same amount of CPU/memory/time on
master as slave. If you find this not true for your workload your best bet is
to fiddle with the allocation parameters and raise the weight of
Source filtering is similar but normally returns nicer results.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 29, 2014, at 8:29 AM, Florentin Zorca wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> try using fields to specify only the fields you are interested in:
>
> http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/s
Ssh tunneling is how I do it. There is always a way to get to port 22.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 27, 2014, at 7:30 AM, David Pilato wrote:
>
> Is the 9200 port open?
>
> --
> David ;-)
> Twitter : @dadoonet / @elasticsearchfr / @scrutmydocs
>
>
> Le 27 mai 2014 à 05:39, Mas Hgnis a écri
Sorry, wasn't reading too closely. If the execution:and is taking sometimes
then that sounds like a bug.
Nik
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 20, 2014, at 3:49 PM, Igal wrote:
>
> hey Nik,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
> you are correct about the default operator being "or", but as I've post
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 20, 2014, at 3:06 PM, "Igal @ getRailo.org" wrote:
>
> I have an index for a Store with a type for Items, i.e. /store/items. among
> other properties, Items have a Title (analyzed text), a Description (analyzed
> text), and Tags (not-analyzed text).
>
> I want
Sorry, you can't reduce it. I imagine the performance increase you get is
because the merge logic is per shard so it does less when there are more shards
for the same data. You can likely get similar numbers if you set the refresh
interval to -1 and play with the merge policy before the bulk loa
Set the min to 2 and max to either 2 or 3 and emit unigrams. That'll get it
working. Also you probably want to set max errors to a number > 1 because .5
means 50% which can get quite large if someone types 20 terms.
That's been my experience with it.
Nik
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 10, 201
The one in chrome will refuse to auto indent invalid json, I believe.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 28, 2014, at 8:41 AM, aristechnologypartn...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> perhaps fairly naive question, but does Sense let you validate JSON documents
> before they are sent to ES? Thx.
>
> I'm using o
My guy says some config will matter on each node (minimum master nodes) and the
rest will only use the master's value.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:15 AM, Robin Clarke wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if anyone knows (can't easily test right now) what happens if
> your elasticsearch co
If you have an index per (some time period) then you can create the new indexes
with more shards when you have more hardware and leave the old ones with their
old number. You can also allocate more shards then noses in preparation for
getting more nodes. I believe those are the standard tactics
If you are using the java API the answer is maybe, it depends on how you use
it. In addition, even if you use the synchronous API you have to wait for a
refresh for you data to be searchable. By default they happen every second.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:21 AM, sowjanya wrot
The native client is lower overhead but you have to use the same version the
client as you do Elasticsearch and you should use the same JVM version as well.
If you do java then those are the trade offs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 23, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Lukáš Vlček wrote:
>> Question: If I in
Have a look at the function score query and for using filters with a boost
factor with it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 17, 2014, at 5:56 PM, khaled gomaa wrote:
>
> Im creating a targeted ads system.
> I have a machine learning part which analyzes the user preference and send me
> a list wi
I was wondering if you technically could downgrade so long as you don't write
or optimize. Not that I suggest it, but it would be neat to know
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, "joergpra...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>
> 0.90.9 uses Lucene 4.6 which is a pretty significant feature u
14 matches
Mail list logo