at calling the same scroll_id won't return the next results?
>
> AFAIK, the scroll_id can be the same and still return new records
>
> 2015-04-14 14:26 GMT-03:00 Todd Nine :
>
>> Hey guys,
>> I have 2 indexes. I have a read alias on both of the indexes (A and
&g
Hey guys,
I have 2 indexes. I have a read alias on both of the indexes (A and B),
and a write alias on 1 (B). I then insert 10 documents to the write alias
which inserts them into index B. I perform the following query.
{
"from" : 0,
"size" : 1,
"post_filter" : {
"bool" : {
Hey all,
I have a bit of an odd question, hopefully someone can give me an answer.
In usergrid, we have our own existing query language. We parse this
language into an AST, then visit each of the nodes and construct an ES
query with the java client. So far, very straight forward. However,
Figured this out (derp). So my next question, is how can I disable dynamic
mappings so that they don't occur?
Thanks,
Todd
On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 3:55:07 PM UTC-6, Todd Nine wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
> We're running ES as a core service, so I can't guarantee that m
Hey guys,
We're running ES as a core service, so I can't guarantee that my
application will be the only one using the cluster. Is it possible to
disallow unmapped fields explicitly for an index without modifying the
global setting?
Thanks,
Todd
--
You received this message because you are
Hey all,
We use ES as our indexing sub system. Our canonical record store is
Cassandra. Due to the denormalization we perform for faster query speed,
occasionally the state of documents in ES can lag behind the state of our
Cassandra instance. To accommodate this eventually consist system,
Hey all,
We're bumping up against a production problem I could use a hand with.
We're experiencing steadily decreasing index speeds. We have 12 c3.4xl
data nodes, and 1 c3.8xl master node (with 2 backups that are smaller).
We're indexing 45 million documents into a single index. Single sha
h/reference/current/modules-cluster.html#allocation-awareness
>
> On 23 February 2015 at 06:46, Todd Nine >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> We have several indexes in our ES cluster. ES is not our canonical
>> system record, we use it only for searching.
>>
>>
Hi All,
We have several indexes in our ES cluster. ES is not our canonical
system record, we use it only for searching.
Some of our applications have very high write throughput, so for these we
allocate a singular primary shard for each of our nodes. For example, we
have 6 nodes, and we cr
Hey Aaron,
What do you get back if you try to use these sets of commands to manually
allocate the shard to a node?
http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/cluster-reroute.html
I had this problem before, but it turned out we had 1 node that had
accidentally be upg
Hey All,
We're on ES 1.4.3. Initially, I thought I had this issue, however it
appears I was incorrect.
https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/9023
We're seeing very uneven primary shard distribution as we're adding new
indexes to our system. We're running a 6 node cluster. W
Hey guys,
We have a slightly different use case than I'm able to find examples for
with the tribe node. Any feedback would be appreciated.
What we have now:
Single region:
We create indexes in our code automatically. They're based on timeuuids,
so we never have to worry about them conflict
the source cluster
> to a node in the target cluster, and place a restore action on a queue on
> the target cluster master, plus a rollback logic if shard transaction
> fails. So in short, the ES cluster to cluster replication process could be
> realized by a "primary
current/streams.html
>
> I'm in favor of Ratpack since it comes with Java 8, Groovy, Google Guava,
> and Netty, which has a resemblance to ES.
>
> In ES, for inter cluster communication, there is not much coded afaik,
> except snapshot/restore. Maybe snapshot/restore c
Hey all,
I would like to create a plugin, and I need a hand. Below are the
requirements I have.
- Our documents are immutable. They are only ever created or deleted,
updates do not apply.
- We want mirrors of our ES cluster in multiple AWS regions. This way
if the WAN between
nks,
Todd
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Mark Walkom wrote:
> You could use snapshot and restore, or even Logstash.
>
> On 15 January 2015 at 10:07, Todd Nine wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> We have a deployment scenario I can't seem to find any examples of, and
&g
Hi all,
We have a deployment scenario I can't seem to find any examples of, and
any help would be greatly appreciated. We're running ElasticSearch in 3
AWS regions. We want these regions to survive a failure from other
regions, and we want all writes and reads from our clients to occur in th
Hey All,
I have a question about the internal implementation of geo hashes and
distance filters. Here is my current understanding, I'm struggling to
figure out how to apply these to our queries internally in ES.
Using bool queries are very efficient. Internally they
perform bitmap union, i
Hey guys,
We're testing ES 1.4.0 from 1.3.2. I'm noticing some strange behavior in
our clients in our integration tests. They perform the following logic.
Create an the first index in the cluster (single node) with a custom
__default__ dynamic mapping
Add 3 documents, each of a a new type
w the NPE you
> posted.
>
> Jörg
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Todd Nine
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm getting some strange behavior from the ES server when using a term
>> query + a geo distance filter + a sort. I've tried this wit
}
},
{ "nu_created" :
{ "order" : "asc",
"ignore_unmapped" : true
}
},
{
"bu_created" : {
Hi all,
I'm getting some strange behavior from the ES server when using a term
query + a geo distance filter + a sort. I've tried this with 1.3.2,
1.3.5, as well as 1.4.0. All exhibit this same behavior. I'm using the
Java transport client. Here is my SearchRequestBuilder payload in
toSt
Hey guys,
We're running some load tests, and we're finding some of our clients are
having issues joining the cluster. We have the following setup running in
EC2.
24 c3.4xlarge ES instances. These instances are our data storage and
search instances.
40 c3.xlarge Tomcat instances. These are
Hi All,
I've been using ES for a while and I'm really enjoying it, but we have a
few slow calls in our code. I have a few hunches around the code that's
using the client inefficiently, but I would like some definitive proof.
I've attempted to profile our application using YourKit when we're
, if you want to add millions of edges to an
> ES doc one by one, this will not be efficient.
>
> So I would like to suggest to avoid the overhead of updating fields by
> script in preference to add / remove relations by their "relation id", i.e.
> to treat relations as first
e statement "Bob likes restaurant Duo"
>
> and then you can run ES queries on the field "likes" or better
> "user.likes" for finding the users that like a restaurant etc. Referencing
> the "id" it is possible to lookup another document in another index ab
So clearly I need to RTFM. I missed this in the documentation the first
time.
http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/mapping.html#_how_types_are_implemented
Will filters at this scale be fast enough?
On Friday, October 3, 2014 11:48:40 AM UTC-6, Todd Nine wrote
Hey guys,
We're currently storing entities and edges in Cassandra. The entities
are JSON, and edges are directed edges with a source---type-->target.
We're using ElasticSearch for indexing and I could really use a hand with
design.
What we're doing currently, is we take an entity, and turn
of hundreds and
> thousands of nodes. From my understanding, the communication of the master
> and 20 nodes is not a serious problem. This becomes an issue at ~500-1000
> nodes.
>
> Jörg
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Todd Nine wrote:
>
many thousands of aliases on a single (or few)
> indices with just a few shards. There is no limit defined by ES, when your
> configuration / hardware capacity is exceeded, you will see the node
> getting sluggish.
>
> Jörg
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Todd Nine > wrote:
&
Hey guys. We’re building a Multi tenant application, where users create
applications within our single server.For our current ES scheme, we're
building an index per application. Are there any stress tests or
documentation on the upper bounds of the number of indexes a cluster can
handl
as ES is sensitive to
> latency.
>
> You may be better off using the snapshot/restore process, or another
> export/import method.
>
> Regards,
> Mark Walkom
>
> Infrastructure Engineer
> Campaign Monitor
> email: ma...@campaignmonitor.com
> web: www.campaignmonitor.co
few 100 GB - it is faster at index recovery or at reallocation time.
>
> Jörg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Todd Nine >
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Jorg,
>> Thanks for the reply. We're using Cassandra heavily in production, I'
tly disk I/O and
> memory related.
>
> In the end, you can take as a rule of thumb:
>
> - add replica to scale "read" load
> - add new indices (i.e. new shards) to scale "write" load
> - and add nodes to scale out the whole cluster for both read and write l
Do not think about rivers, they are not built for such use cases. Rivers
> are designed as a "play tool" for fetching data quickly from external
> sources, for demo purpose. They are discouraged for serious production use,
> they are not very reliable if they run unattended.
>
&
hardware will handle things.
>
> As for reading the transaction log and searching it, you might be playing
> a losing game as your code to parse and search would have to be super quick
> to make worth doing.
>
> Regards,
> Mark Walkom
>
> Infrastructure Engineer
>
ur commit log (via storing it in
memory until flush) that would be ideal.
Thoughts?
> Regards,
> Mark Walkom
>
> Infrastructure Engineer
> Campaign Monitor
> email: ma...@campaignmonitor.com
> web: www.campaignmonitor.com
>
>
> On 5 June 2014 04:18, Todd Nine wr
Hey all,
Sorry to resurrect a dead thread. Did you ever find a solution for
eventual consistency of documents across EC2 regions?
Thanks,
todd
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 5:50:00 AM UTC-7, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
> +1 on all of the above. es-reindex already in my list of things to
> invest
Hi All,
We've been using elastic search as our search index for our new
persistence implementation.
https://usergrid.incubator.apache.org/
I have a few questions I could use a hand with.
1) Is there any good documentation on the upper limit to count of
documents, or total index size, befor
39 matches
Mail list logo