I am sure you can test it to confirm :)
On 2 February 2015 at 19:17, Ernesto Reig wrote:
> It should but.. is it?
>
> On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 10:16:17 PM UTC+1, Mark Walkom wrote:
>>
>> Yes, it should be.
>>
>> On 30 January 2015 at 21:35, Ernesto Reig wrote:
>>
>>> Any comments on this?
It should but.. is it?
On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 10:16:17 PM UTC+1, Mark Walkom wrote:
>
> Yes, it should be.
>
> On 30 January 2015 at 21:35, Ernesto Reig
> > wrote:
>
>> Any comments on this?
>>
>> On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 5:06:12 PM UTC+1, Ernesto Reig wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> T
Yes, it should be.
On 30 January 2015 at 21:35, Ernesto Reig wrote:
> Any comments on this?
>
> On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 5:06:12 PM UTC+1, Ernesto Reig wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> This might sound a dumb question but just in case: Is the fielddata
>> belonging to a given index evicted when t
Any comments on this?
On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 5:06:12 PM UTC+1, Ernesto Reig wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> This might sound a dumb question but just in case: Is the fielddata
> belonging to a given index evicted when that index is removed?
>
> Thnks
>
--
You received this message because you ar
Hi all,
This might sound a dumb question but just in case: Is the fielddata
belonging to a given index evicted when that index is removed?
Thnks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
