Sorry! but I don't understand. I tried to replace _id by _type and I get 4
documents.
Would you be able to give me the related short mapping that would work? For
instance for the data:
product_id product_info_id
'1' 1
'1' 2
Hello ,
In that case you should make product_id as _type rather than _id.
Thanks
Vineeth
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:38 PM, EzCocos wrote:
> Many thanks Vineeth for your help.
>
> product_id is indeed unique. If I remove _id I get 4 documents rather than
> 2 documents containing each an
Many thanks Vineeth for your help.
product_id is indeed unique. If I remove _id I get 4 documents rather than
2 documents containing each an array of related product_info_id.
I guess I want _id to be the key under which same product_id got
aggregated. In other word if I remove _id, how Elastics
Hello ,
Is product_id unique , seems to me its not.
In that case why have you made it as _id.
_id should be unique and in face of dedupe , it would be over written.
So remove defenition of _id should solve the issue.
Thanks
Vineeth
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:09 PM, EzCocos wrote:
> De
