Hi,
I am curious about the same thing. Is this possible?
I am on ES 1.0.2, and my experiments show; No.
Seem's like it should be doable though?
Thanks,
-- Chris
On Friday, May 17, 2013 8:30:30 AM UTC-5, pgaertig wrote:
Hi,
Is it to possible to link _version special property to document's
I apologize having to reply to my own message.
But please replace all CID w/ MID below. I started editing the text and
inadvertently hit Send.
Thanks,
-- Chris
On Friday, June 6, 2014 1:03:20 PM UTC-5, Chris Berry wrote:
Greetings,
I have a couple of questions about keys and routing
Hello,
I am trying to set indices.memory.index_buffer_size to 30% using curl to my
running cluster
And I am not able to make it stick
I am doing this:
$ curl -XPUT http://foo:9200/_cluster/settings -d '{ persistent : {
indices.memory.index_buffer_size : 30% }}'
Greetings,
Recently, as suggested in this mailing list and the inter-web in several
posts, we used the elasticsearch-reindex plugin to change the number of
Shards for a given large Index, because the Shards for that Index had
become too large.
But after the reindex — we could not search
Greetings,
Let me say up-front, I am a huge fan and proponent of Elasticsearch. It is
a beautiful tool.
So, that said, it surprises me that Elasticsearch has such a pedestrian
flaw, and serializes it's Exceptions using Java Serialization.
In a big shop it is quite difficult (i.e. next to
, or try and
serialize exceptions using Jackson.
I would be very careful in introducing this just because of a (one time bug)
in Java.
On Friday, March 21, 2014 5:18:38 PM UTC+1, Chris Berry wrote:
Greetings,
Let me say up-front, I am a huge fan and proponent of Elasticsearch
,
then this is something we need to address.
On Friday, March 21, 2014 7:12:02 PM UTC+1, Chris Berry wrote:
If it happened once, then by definition it will happen again. History repeats
itself. ;-)
What exactly would you lose?
You are simply trading one rigid serialization scheme for another more
Greetings,
I have a question about Shard balancing.
I have a 5 Node Cluster with a particular Index that has 4 Shards, 1 Replica
So 8 Shards total.
And when I look at the Index it is allocated as follows; (Note: P=primary,
R=replica)
Node 1: P0
Node 2: P1, P2, P3
Node 3:
Node 4: R0
Node 5: R1,
