The DISP key sends the Y of X.YYY.ZZZ on the display. Is there a way to read
the X and ZZZ parts too? You can get it to send X.YYY by changing bands, but
I'd prefer to be able to get a full readout without changing bands. The KX1
reads both sides of the VFO freq when the band button is pr
My IC746PRO has a "Bug Mode" where it would emulate a bug using physical
paddles.
Its sorta neat to play with, but as others have said, using paddles to
emulate a bug makes my brain wonky since I go by feel (even at my 10wpm).
An option would be nice for both the K3 and KX3 since it makes the rig
I agree with you and Don. My previous interest in a "bug mode" was that when
I'm not in a position to use my real bug, I'd like to have a keyer that did
not make automatic dashes just so I don't lose my bug rhythm.
After a few decades of using an Iambic keyer before returning to my old
mechanical
But he wouldn't be using a bug. He'd be using the electronic keyer in
the KX3. Dots would be electronically generated even if dashes weren't.
Straight keys, bugs and cooties (I use all three) explicitly meet the
SKCC rules because they are mechanical keys. An electronic keyer
probably isn't ap
On 10/20/2013 8:10 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
I have never found electronic "bug modes" to be satisfactory for me.
With a mechanical bug, there is positive feedback to the keying that is
important to me - that is entirely missing from an electronic keyer set
to bug mode. It may be my shortcoming, bu
I have never found electronic "bug modes" to be satisfactory for me.
With a mechanical bug, there is positive feedback to the keying that is
important to me - that is entirely missing from an electronic keyer set
to bug mode. It may be my shortcoming, but I just cannot get the hang
of it.
B
Good point, but I have found that a lot of SKCC members enjoy using their
bugs *instead* of a 'straight key', so I can understand the interest.
SKCC might better be called the MKCC for Manual Key Century Club.
I have run into a lot of bugs on "Straight Key Night" sponsored by the ARRL
too.
73
Wouldn't that sort of defeat the idea of a straight key club which is to
encourage using a straight key not pretending to use one?
Eric
KE6US
SKCC 86
On 10/20/2013 4:56 PM, Joel Black wrote:
I wonder if it would be too difficult to emulate a bug with the KX3
keyer. Something similar to what K
I'm building a KPA100 and am having trouble with the SWR bridge adjustment.
I'm getting high swr on the lower bands and can't get 1:1 on even the upper
bands.
160 9.9:1
809.9:1
409.9:1
309.5:1
206.7:1
175.0:1
154.5:1
124.0:2
103.7:1
(I know 9.9 is the highest it wil
I wonder if it would be too difficult to emulate a bug with the KX3
keyer. Something similar to what K1EL does with his K14 keyers (and
possibly the WinKeyer). That way, those of us who are SKCC members can
take our paddles and use them to emulate a bug when out in the field
without having to
To sum up the interesting studies from the early 90's on Morse code
recognition and the effects of pitch frequency, signal to noise ratio and
code speed I posted the abstracts of some of the Montnemery papers on my
blog as well as some key illustrations.
See http://la3za.blogspot.no/2013/10/studi
Bad assumption. Without a model mentioned I was thinking about the KX3, not
the K3. 300 Hz is correct for the K3.
73, Ron AC7AC
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013
On 10/20/2013 1:46 PM, mcduf...@ag0n.net wrote:
All this said, remember if you are detecting tones ELECTRONICALLY (not by
ear/brain cooperation), higher frequencies work better. The reason is the same
as what makes VHF PL tones work better when they are in the higher end of the
chart. There are
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 06:36:00 -0700 (PDT), Sverre Holm (LA3ZA) wrote:
> Based on this result, it would be interesting to zoom in on the frequencies
> between 250 and 500 Hz for further testing, also higher speeds would be
> interesting to test as 40 and 80 is the same as 8 and 16 wpm. Peter
> Montn
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Oliver Johns wrote:
> ...440, a pure standard A...
>
Gee, maybe it's a good thing radio wasn't invented back in the days when A
was 415.
Tony KT0NY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mai
I assume you are talking about the KX3 beta firmware. This discussion has
been about the K3 sidetone pitch. Production firmware level for the K3 is
4.67.
Bruce N1RX
> I'm using 1.69 beta firmware that stops at 400 Hz.
__
Elecraft mail
What 1.69 beta firmware?
Current/Latest Production release is 4.67
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 10/20/2013 3:22 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
I'm using 1.69 beta firmware that stops at 400 Hz.
I'm just happy that the 1 kHz sidetone that was almost "standard" for many
years is no longer popular. A
I'm using 1.69 beta firmware that stops at 400 Hz.
I'm just happy that the 1 kHz sidetone that was almost "standard" for many
years is no longer popular. All of my radio licensing CW tests at the FCC
offices used 1 kHz. That made my brain ache, not to mention the tendency for
it to echo when usin
Tonight is the October 2013 edition of the Run For The Bacon. That
friendly lil' ol' QRP Sprint sponsored by your friends at the Flying Pigs
QRP Amateur Radio Club International. Join us for a spell to have some fun
and to say "Hi" to friends, old and new.
The time is the same as always:
East c
Oliver,
I've used my K3 on 440 for several years.
73 Don K5AQ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list host
> My only gripe is that the K3 choice range doesn't go down to 400 Hz.
It certainly does - it goes down to 300 Hz. However, I find A4 a bit
low for my taste - I'm satisfied with a 3.88 Hz error on B4 or 3.25 Hz
error on C5.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 10/20/2013 1:43 PM, Oliver Johns wrote:
Hi
Oliver,
My K3 goes down to 300Hz!
73 Stephen G4SJP
On 20 October 2013 18:43, Oliver Johns wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> My only gripe is that the K3 choice range doesn't go down to 400 Hz. I'd
> like to use 440, a pure standard A.
>
> 73,
>
> Oliver
> W6ODJ
>
>
> On 19 Jan. 2013, at 22:30 PM, Jim Bro
Hi Jim,
My only gripe is that the K3 choice range doesn't go down to 400 Hz. I'd like
to use 440, a pure standard A.
73,
Oliver
W6ODJ
On 19 Jan. 2013, at 22:30 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On 10/19/2013 2:36 PM, Al Lorona wrote:
>> When I was a kid 750 Hz was the most popular sidetone frequency.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: htt
I think I'll replace all my K3 wiring with Monster Cable and replace the
speaker with a Bose Wave system
Shouldn't be needed, however..
* *
Rich
NU6T
On 10/19/2013 11:22 PM, Al Lorona wrote:
You are right about all of that, but the original post (and the original QST
letter to which
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: htt
Are you saying they don't?
On 10/19/2013 11:22 PM, Al Lorona wrote:
The next thing you know, someone somewhere is going to claim that Elecraft radios soldered with 63/37 solder sound superior to those soldered with a different blend.
Al W6LX [who listens at about a D-flat]
There is a study from 1992 that tested recognition rate vs pitch frequency.
Unfortunately only a few tones were tested, but at least one can infer that
a low tone is preferrable. This is in Montnemery, Peter, Bengt Almqvist, and
Sten Harris. "Recognition of telegraphy signs at different listening l
Unless you're using APF, in which case a few Hz might make a
difference.
Like others, I don't buy the musical CW pitch theory either. However,
the pitch of a CW note IS important, and there may be different
optimum pitches for various different reception conditions (assuming
your hearing response
I don't have perfect pitch, but I have "pretty good" pitch. For example, I
can tune in a RTTY signal without any tuning aids.
As a high speed CW guy, I once experimented with various base frequencies to
see if it affected my upper speed limit. My hypothesis was since square
waves are odd harmoni
30 matches
Mail list logo