Any intelligence on narrow Digit modes?
Dan VA3MA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http
Could Elecraft explain why the KX2 design doesn't allow operating say JT65 out
of the box?
What prohibits manufacturing the rig to do the narrow digital modes?
Would be helpful to know
Thanks
Dan VA3MA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Sorry
I didn't mean to imply decoding JT modes inside the KX2
I was wondering why the rig is not frequency stable for narrow digital modes
using a PC for encode/decode.
Why could it not be manufactured more stable??
Dan VA3MA
On 2016-05-24, at 9:11, Matt Maguire wrote:
Some possible re
Could Elecraft explain why the KX2 design doesn't allow operating say JT65 out
of the box?
What prohibits manufacturing the rig to do the narrow digital modes?
Would be helpful to know
Thanks
Dan VA3MA
I notice Wayne is ignoring explaining their design decision - commenting on all
d preamps).
>
> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 08:57:27 -0400
> From: Dan - VA3MA
> To: Elecraft
> Subject: [Elecraft] Narrow Digital Modes ??
> Message-ID: <36339378-65db-4de0-a268-e2f52f442...@me.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Has anyone had the opportunity to see if the KX2 out of the box will be stable
enough to run JT65 & JT9
Would appreciate feedback as I’m apartment dweller and only run these digital
modes with compromised antenna
Thanks
Dan V
:
> http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/12852
>
> The N9JR review.
>
> Phil W7OX
>
>
> On 5/29/16 12:40 PM, Dan - VA3MA wrote:
>> Has anyone had the opportunity to see if the KX2 out of the box will be
>> stable enough to run JT65 & JT9
>> Would apprecia
Luke
Thanks - just what I needed to know!
Have you tried JT9 ?
Perhaps some sort of heatsink/handles added to the case might help??
73
Dan VA3MA
On 2016-05-29, at 22:37, Luke wrote:
Hmm, not sure why it cut out my message. Here's what I wrote:
I've used my KX2 on WSPR and JT65 and
Jim
When one makes it personal
I'm done
Have a happy day and enjoy ham radio
72
> On May 30, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>
>> On Mon,5/30/2016 4:50 AM, D Howard wrote:
>> I thought at the price I paid for the KX3 I shouldn't have to do the
>> compensation nor run the KX3 at such reduced
Edward
Your test results are much appreciated! Any very informative!
Thank you kind sir
Would be interesting to be able to compare a newer KX3 with rev E boards to
your past test results
73
Dan
> On May 30, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
>
> I ran extensive frequency drift measurements
KIO2 RS-232 Interface and Aux I/O for Elecraft K2 Transceiver
I have a partially completed KIO2 kit - I no longer have a K2
>From the Elecraft website ="You'll be able to do full computer control of the
>K2 with the KIO2 installed, and you won't need an external level converter,
>since the KIO2 p
11 matches
Mail list logo