Re: [Elecraft] [K2] CAL FIL Temperature Sensitivity Question

2014-05-23 Thread John Oppenheimer
Fixed! A year of looking at solder joints, and flowing a few, did not fix the problem. I recently ordered and replaced L33 and the two BFO crystals. The three parts fixed the problem! Replaced L33 so that I did not need to worry about breaking the fine wires when removing the old one. John KN5L O

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] CAL FIL Temperature Sensitivity Question

2013-07-24 Thread John Oppenheimer
Performed another test today, last night I aligned 200 Hz CW normal to 04913.08, First power up this afternoon 04913.21, after one hour warm up (no transmitting) 04913.10. John KN5L On 07/24/2013 12:39 PM, John Oppenheimer wrote: > Hi Don, > > My question is directed specifically at the CAL FIL

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] CAL FIL Temperature Sensitivity Question

2013-07-24 Thread John Oppenheimer
Hi Don, My question is directed specifically at the CAL FIL BFO frequency being 100 Hz different between cold and warm. As mentioned, because the BFO frequency is off by 100 Hz, the 200 HZ filter is unusable because a properly received pitch will place the signal on the filter skirt. This K2 seri

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] CAL FIL Temperature Sensitivity Question

2013-07-24 Thread Don Wilhelm
John, The specified stability for the K2 is less than a 100 Hz drift from a cold start at 25 degC, so your K2 is within the specification (granted it is just on the border). The drift will usually be worse for a K2 with the KPA100 installed than a basic K2 because there is more heat generate

[Elecraft] [K2] CAL FIL Temperature Sensitivity Question

2013-07-24 Thread John Oppenheimer
My K2 has a 100 Hz difference in CAL FIL frequencies between cold and full warm up. The 100 Hz difference renders the 200 Hz BW unusable until the K2 warms up. Is this typical, or do I have a component with excessive temperature instability? John KN5L _