Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-17 Thread Don Wilhelm
Bill, Congratulations, it sounds like you have achieved success. Once set the K2 alignment usually remains stable for a long time. If it ain't broke, don't fix it! Don W3FPR On 6/17/2019 10:36 AM, Bill Coleman wrote: Well, I think I finally got it sorted. I replaced D1 and D2 on my

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-17 Thread Bill Coleman
Well, I think I finally got it sorted. I replaced D1 and D2 on my KAT100. One of the diodes was good, the other was likely bad since I couldn’t get the SWR bridge to null, but I destroyed it while extracting it from the board. New diodes are in machined socket pins, which will make them easy

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-12 Thread Don Wilhelm
Bill, Yes, do the CAL FIL calibration first.  If that does not cure anything, then proceed with the rest of the alignment, but I doubt if that will help much - the K2 alignment is usually quite stable over time. The bandpass filter and other alignments are not going to change the relationship

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-12 Thread Bill Coleman
Yeah, this is looking more like a calibration problem. I’m listening to W1AW code practice on 14.0475. As I cycle through the filters the S-units are roughly the same through OP1, 0.4 and 0.16. But on the 1.0 bandwidth, it is often 1-2 S-units lower. If I tune about 200 Hz lower, I get the

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-12 Thread Bill Coleman
Fortunately, I found the Rework Eliminators easily. Swapping out the KSB2 for the eliminators didn’t evidence a change in the CW variable bandwidth filter. It’s weird, it appears to be working OK at the moment, but the CW 1.0 filter sounds weird. LSB and USB sound a little weird, too. I

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-11 Thread Don Wilhelm
Bill for receive, you only need the jumpers at J9 and J10 - it is quick and easy to do with bent wires if you do not find the rework eliminators is short order. Those jumper wires will not complete the transmit path - only receive. 73, Don W3FPR On 6/11/2019 5:03 PM, Bill Coleman wrote: I

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-11 Thread Bill Coleman
I own a set of Rework Eliminator modules, so that should be easy. I just have to find them…. > On Jun 11, 2019, at 3:09 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Bill, > > First try removing the KSB2 - put bent wire jumpers between pins 1 and 3 of > J9 and J10. Then see if you get a good response in CW. >

Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-11 Thread Don Wilhelm
Bill, First try removing the KSB2 - put bent wire jumpers between pins 1 and 3 of J9 and J10. Then see if you get a good response in CW. Oh BTW, make sure the CW filters are centered at your sidetone pitch first - use an audio spectrum analyzer and if you have one, a broadband noise

[Elecraft] [K2] Low sensitivity with variable-bandwidth filter

2019-06-11 Thread Bill Coleman
OK, I have a K2/100 w/ KAT100 that may have recently suffered from a static discharge event. I had to replace D16 & D17 in the KPA100, and I’m likely to do the same to the SWR bridge diodes in the KAT100 (since I can’t get the bridge to null properly). The other thing I noticed is that the