On 12/27/2017 8:10 AM, George Pasek wrote:
> Now I’m thinking of using two HF/VHF Duplexers (or Diplexer as they are also
> called)
Not the same. A duplexer is used to permit simultaneous transmit and
receive functions in an application such as a repeater. A diplexer is
used to combine the
Exactly right! And MUCH more than "a bit fussy" -- these are passive
networks, and ALL passive networks depend on both source and load
impedances being right. Don't expect something like this to work right
(or handle power) with non-resonant antennas.
73, Jim K9YC
On 12/27/2017 9:18 AM, Bob
You will need a duplexer on each ends of the coax. Preferably these
should be identical. One at the bottom end to combine the HF and VHF
signals to one coax and then on the top end to split the HF and VHF
signals to feed each respective antenna. Do be mindful that these
units are a bit
Used triplexers for years, HF, 2, 70 cm, one run to tower, worked great. I
think mine were Comet. Just watch the SEE with higher power.
Fred K6DGW
George Pasek wrote:
>2 Radios, 2 Antennas, 1 Coax.
>
>That pretty much says it all. I currently have a KX3 and a 2-meter rig
2 Radios, 2 Antennas, 1 Coax.
That pretty much says it all. I currently have a KX3 and a 2-meter rig (but
I’ll probably be outfitting the KX3 with 2m’s in the future) and I use a
HamSticks for HF or a 1/4 wave GP for 2 meters. Running another coax here is
not a option (apartment) so I have
5 matches
Mail list logo