After reading Bills (W4ZV) response to my comment(s) on the dynamic
range presentation I think I understand the issue taken with what I
said. Bandwidth is a terrible thing to waste but hopefully the
misunderstanding can be fixed.
I made a tongue-in-cheek comment that I could fool the guys in my
I understood what you wrote perfectly. I don't know what the fuss was about
and don't think an apology was necessary.
--- On Wed, 9/16/09, William Carver bcar...@safelink.net wrote:
From: William Carver bcar...@safelink.net
Subject: [Elecraft] dynamic range bandwidth
To: Elecraft
ARRL, RSGB (RadCom), W8JI and Sherwood always use 500 Hz or
the Closest Available to 500 Hz (per ARRL Test
Procedure). Sherwood is the only tester who sometimes uses
additional bandwidths but they are always footnoted.
73, Bill W4ZV
I understand that, because I pore over others test data
W7AAZ:
I understand that, because I pore over others test data to compare my
own receiver work with the professionals. And I know the difference in
dynamic range between 400 Hz and 500 Hz is very, very small.
About 1 dB from Elecraft's own measurements if I recall correctly.
But in
4 matches
Mail list logo
