Jim, THank you for the set up suggestion. Will try it once I get my radio
back.
Bill
K9YEQ
-Original Message-
From: Jim Miller KG0KP [mailto:jimmil...@stl-online.net]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:43 PM
To: Bill K9YEQ
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs. 2.8 vs. 1.8 & 2.1
No pro
ge-
> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill K9YEQ
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:47 PM
> To: 'David Ferrington, M0XDF'; 'Bob Garceau'
> Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft]
via macro?
Bill
K9YEQ
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred Atchley
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 3:40 PM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs. 2.8 vs. 1.8 & 2.1
Bill, K9YEQ wrote: Is an
Bill, K9YEQ wrote: Is anyone using the 2.8 and
2.1/1.8 filters and what is the on-the-air experience?
End snip
I have 5 of the 8-pole filters: 2.8, 2.1, 1.8, 400 & 250. As the bands get
more crowded (I.e. contest) I just tighten down the bandwidth. Of course a
wider BW sounds better (especially
ngton, M0XDF'; 'Bob Garceau'
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8 vs 1.8 & 2.1
I am using a pair of 8 pole 2.8 and am very happy. There is at times tons
of qrm on 75 meters in the evening. Question: Is anyone using the 2.8 and
2.1/1.8 filters an
I am using a pair of 8 pole 2.8 and am very happy. There is at times tons
of qrm on 75 meters in the evening. Question: Is anyone using the 2.8 and
2.1/1.8 filters and what is the on-the-air experience?
Bill
K9YEQ
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecra
6 matches
Mail list logo
