Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-18 Thread Rick Bates
I'll restate: The length of coax should be as short as feasible because the losses from mismatch (SWR) are highest when compared to window or ladder line. The shortest distance from my rig to the choke is about ten feet unless I bring the window line inside (too problematic) or put the rig in t

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-17 Thread Wes (N7WS)
I said earlier: "Rick claims that when using a series connection of two different transmission lines, one coaxial, one window line, changing the length of one (coax) affects something or the other, while changing the length of the other portion (window line) has no effect whatsoever. This is

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-17 Thread Fred Jensen
On 5/17/2014 2:29 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote: My apologies for confusing two different posters to this thread. Partly a consequence of threading and me using two different computers and two different email clients. I thought that's what having an email client thread emails was supposed to prevent.

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-17 Thread Rick Bates
For clarity: every line has loss. Every single line. What should have been better implied is that coax exhibits a significantly higher loss per foot than window line; while both have losses. This is well proven over decades of use. High SWR affects the losses in a negative way (the losses

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-17 Thread Wes (N7WS)
My apologies for confusing two different posters to this thread. Partly a consequence of threading and me using two different computers and two different email clients. I want to specifically address this: Rick claims that when using a series connection of two different transmission lines, o

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-16 Thread Rick Bates
Sure it does, you're changing the line losses, tweaking C and L and therefore the SWR (always measured at the tuner, but moving peaks and valleys closer/further away from that point) any time you alter the system. There are specific resonant points in an antenna system (typically each half wave

[Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-16 Thread Peter Torry
Iain, It may be worth going back to basics and reading up on doublet antennas as well as open wire feeders. The critical length is half of the top plus the feeder length and this should be adjusted so that it isn't resonant on any band you wish to use. This because it is easier to match a m

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-15 Thread Bill W2BLC
I use a 260 foot doublet fed with 600 ohm tuned feeder (4" spacing #14 wire). It is run as an NVIS antenna - up 26 feet and flat. The K3 auto-tuner and the KAT500 both tune it very well for 160/80/40/30 meters. I do not use it on the upper bands. The feedline is about 25 feet long and is termin

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-15 Thread Fred Jensen
On 5/15/2014 12:22 PM, Iain G4SGX wrote: Hello, Does anyone use a 270 foot doublet with the K3 ATU? Yes Is there a combination of feeder type/length and Balun type & coax length that tunes OK on 160-10? My primary 40/60/80/160 antenna is a center-fed dipole in an inverted-V configuration.

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-15 Thread Wes (N7WS)
Why the caveat about line resonance? Should make no difference. Besides when the system is tuned, it's resonant. Wes N7WS On 5/15/2014 12:46 PM, Matt Zilmer wrote: As long as the balanced line isn't resonant, you should be OK. I use 61 feet here (18.6m) and it works fine from 2.8 MHz up.

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-15 Thread Wes (N7WS)
This makes no logical sense, unless you have a big common-mode problem. Wes N7WS On 5/15/2014 12:54 PM, Rick Bates, WA6NHC wrote: Changing the length of the coax portion has a HUGE impact on where (or if) the system tunes; the window line, none. ___

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-15 Thread Rick Bates, WA6NHC
I use a 104 meter (340') dipole (double extended Zepp for 75/80 meters); fed in the middle with 100' of 450 ohm window line on all bands. In it's original configuration, I fed that with a 1:1 common mode choke (a DX Engineering balun, converting the feed to coax) into the K3. The K3 tuner was

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-15 Thread Bob KD7YZ
On 5/15/2014 15:22, Iain G4SGX wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone use a 270 foot doublet with the K3 ATU? I am using circa 270 feet, as OCF. The 450-ladder-line is roughly 130 feet. The height above variable terrain is 80 feet. The ladder line drops into a 4:1 balun then 4 feet of coax. K3 KAT500 t

Re: [Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-15 Thread Matt Zilmer
As long as the balanced line isn't resonant, you should be OK. I use 61 feet here (18.6m) and it works fine from 2.8 MHz up. The doublet is 150 feet, total length. So far I haven't found a freq that the K3's ATU cannot tune, and that includes many MARS channels outside and between the U.S. Amate

[Elecraft] 270 foot (ish) Doublet & K3 ATU

2014-05-15 Thread Iain G4SGX
Hello, Does anyone use a 270 foot doublet with the K3 ATU? Is there a combination of feeder type/length and Balun type & coax length that tunes OK on 160-10? I am currently thinking a 1:1 balun and 33 foot of 300 ohm feeder. Obviously the coax length should be short but too short may cause r