Re: [Elecraft] CAL FIL question on K2 #4565

2005-04-16 Thread BobConvers
Thanks, Ron. I did indeed have the BFO for FIL1 on CW-R on the wrong side. I cranked the BFO parameter up toward the center value and beyond, and saw another bandpass display (the right one) on Spectrogram. I had not appreciated that you will get a similar display on either side of the ban

RE: [Elecraft] CAL FIL question on K2 #4565

2005-04-16 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Bob, WO3E wrote: So I selected 600 as the sidetone and tried to re-do CAL FIL. CW NORMAL went well, and I got slightly different values than for 650 Hz, as expected. Most of CW REVERSE seemed OK also - except for FIL1 and FIL4. For FIL1, the BFO parameter was EXACTLY the same as for CW NOR

[Elecraft] CAL FIL question on K2 #4565

2005-04-16 Thread BobConvers
I completed assembly of #4565 and all seemed well. I used Spectrogram to perform CAL FIL using the N0SS article as a guide, but chose 650Hz as my sidetone freq since I thought I preferred a slightly higher tone, and selected 100Hz as FIL4 bandwidth. I completed the CAL FIL process, with all