ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Elecraft Discussion List"
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Cal AT100 SWR bridge
Morning Dan,
Agree with all. My thinking was to remove the antenna system from the
equation so that the "baseline" could be checked
Silicone II at most hardware stores.
Don Brown
- Original Message -
From: Rich McCabe<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Elecraft Reflector<mailto:elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 10:31 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Cal AT100 SWR bridge
Is ther
rom: "Dan Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Elecraft"
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Cal AT100 SWR bridge
> Is the Diawa between the K2 and the Tuner, or between the Tuner and the
> Antenna?
> Is the Antenna resonant?
>
> You s
Is the Diawa between the K2 and the Tuner, or between the Tuner and the
Antenna?
Is the Antenna resonant?
You should not expect a "flat" SWR after the tuner unless the
antenna/feedline system is a perfect match - That's the purpose of the tuner
in the first place.
To compare apples to apples, che
rrect readings.
Good luck es 73,
Geoff GM4ESD
- Original Message -
From: "Rich McCabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Elecraft Reflector"
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 4:31 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] Cal AT100 SWR bridge
> Is there any tricks (or improved techniques
Is there any tricks (or improved techniques) on adjusting the SWR bridge in
the tuner? I just finished a tuner and everything checked out and calibrated
very easy. But I may have a SWR that agrees on my Daiwa in the line 16" away
or it may be as high as 4:1 on some bands even when the tuner says
6 matches
Mail list logo
