tially the same
> situation as someone with CC&R.
>
> From:
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
> Message-ID: <004801d02ffc$bda1dc70$38e59550$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Sorry for my conf
ering
From: Walter Underwood
To: Elecraft Reflector
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Two channels of 16-bit 192kHz audio compressed with FLAC should use around
500kbits/s. That is a chunk of bandwidth, but it is fairly reasonable
torage lot someday with me an old
> codger living in assisted-living with a computer for control;
> essentially the same situation as someone with CC&R.
>
> From:
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
> Message-ID: <004801d02ffc$bda1dc70$38e5955
e nice to
>> have the control station use a P3 with the extra data lines intergraded into
>> the 1258, or K3/0 mini mark II :-).
>>
>>
>> 73 Jeff kb2m
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf
@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred
> Jensen
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 19:59 PM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
>
> Hmmm ... K3 1st IF is ~8 MHz. Could pose some problems for generally
> available "overIP&
meday with me an old
codger living in assisted-living with a computer for control;
essentially the same situation as someone with CC&R.
From:
To:
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Message-ID: <004801d02ffc$bda1dc70$38e59550$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; ch
-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred
Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 19:59 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Hmmm ... K3 1st IF is ~8 MHz. Could pose some problems for generally
available "overIP" for many people. I/Q sounds li
Hmmm ... K3 1st IF is ~8 MHz. Could pose some problems for generally
available "overIP" for many people. I/Q sounds like a better
way to go with a PX3? I guess that would require an outboard quadrature
demod at the "real" K3.
While I don't do remote stuff right now, we're eventually going t
It might make more sense to mix the IF down to baseband I/Q, bring the audio
back, then run a remote PX3. It would need a high-bandwidth audio connection,
though, probably with lossless compression.
wunder
K6WRU
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Jan 13, 2015, at 3:27 PM, Harry Yingst vi
When you stop and think about it I really wonder if they could make a P3/0
For the most part much of the P3 screen does not change at any given moment.so
if they only send the changes I would venture to say that much of it could
besent over the wire much as we now send Voice Over IP.
Using the cu
10 matches
Mail list logo
