with me an old
codger living in assisted-living with a computer for control;
essentially the same situation as someone with CCR.
From: k...@arrl.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Message-ID: 004801d02ffc$bda1dc70$38e59550$@net
Content-Type: text
From: Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org
To: Elecraft Reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Two channels of 16-bit 192kHz audio compressed with FLAC should use around
500kbits/s. That is a chunk
for control;
essentially the same situation as someone with CCR.
From: k...@arrl.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Message-ID: 004801d02ffc$bda1dc70$38e59550$@net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sorry for my confusion, I
:59 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Hmmm ... K3 1st IF is ~8 MHz. Could pose some problems for generally
available somethingoverIP for many people. I/Q sounds like a better way
to go with a PX3? I guess that would require an outboard
kb2m
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred
Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 19:59 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Hmmm ... K3 1st IF is ~8 MHz. Could pose some
@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Message-ID: 004801d02ffc$bda1dc70$38e59550$@net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sorry for my confusion, I was thinking IQ as the usable form of IF at the
control site, not the raw 8 mHz IF. My idea would
...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred
Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 19:59 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/0 all in one box? + P3/0
Hmmm ... K3 1st IF is ~8 MHz. Could pose some problems for generally
available somethingoverIP for many people. I/Q sounds like
Hmmm ... K3 1st IF is ~8 MHz. Could pose some problems for generally
available somethingoverIP for many people. I/Q sounds like a better
way to go with a PX3? I guess that would require an outboard quadrature
demod at the real K3.
While I don't do remote stuff right now, we're eventually
When you stop and think about it I really wonder if they could make a P3/0
For the most part much of the P3 screen does not change at any given moment.so
if they only send the changes I would venture to say that much of it could
besent over the wire much as we now send Voice Over IP.
Using the
It might make more sense to mix the IF down to baseband I/Q, bring the audio
back, then run a remote PX3. It would need a high-bandwidth audio connection,
though, probably with lossless compression.
wunder
K6WRU
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Jan 13, 2015, at 3:27 PM, Harry Yingst
10 matches
Mail list logo
