It doesn't bother me that the March QST sort of implied it was knocking
the K3 off the pillar for the worlds coolest radio. (the SDR review with
SDR-500 and K3 near the backpages).. It's not that the ARRL in general
would be the best source of such information -- if the Daryll and Daryll
, February 13, 2009 11:55 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 QST March review
It doesn't bother me that the March QST sort of implied it was knocking the
K3 off the pillar for the worlds coolest radio. (the SDR review with SDR-500
and K3 near the backpages).. It's
I'm mostly interested in what upside surprise awaits us in Dayton. What
ever it is that Elecraft is going throw down, I'm looking forward to it.
Panadapters? KPA800 KPA1500? Something completely different?
Oh why did you have to mention this...
Something far more controversial, like a K3 tee shirt!
;)
Yer right. Disregard.
--
Jeff Wandling DE W7BRS K3 #2105 http://w7brs.com/k3
j...@w7brs.com
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Toby Deinhardt wrote:
I'm mostly interested in what upside surprise awaits us in Dayton. What
ever it is that
Jeff Wandling W7BRS-2 wrote:
It doesn't bother me that the March QST sort of implied it was knocking
the K3 off the pillar for the worlds coolest radio. (the SDR review with
SDR-5000 and K3 near the backpages).
I don't see how you concluded that. Gene W3ZZ (who owns a K3) is saying
Gene W3ZZ (who owns a K3) is saying the
two rigs have very comparable RF performance. I might quibble that he
omitted BDR in his table but perhaps that's more of an HF issue than
VHF
(Gene's focus in the VHF column). For both Phase Noise and BDR, the K3
exceeds the 5000 by ~15 dB (not
Toby Deinhardt wrote:
Panadapters? KPA800 KPA1500? Something completely different?
Oh why did you have to mention this...
Oh, please! It would be nice to have the K3 working properly with all
features implemented first.
-
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222.
http://www.g4ilo.com/
7 matches
Mail list logo
