Re: [Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-12 Thread Brett Howard
Yes I'm also hoping/waiting for AM TX to be allowed on an FM filter. I've yet to try it but I'm sure if I lie to the K3 it'll work... As to how clean and w/in spec it'll be that would take some looking... ~BTH On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 07:19 -0600, Duncan Carter wrote: Using the FM filter for AM

Re: [Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-11 Thread Tom W8JI
I can't speak for details on the K3. Only generally. I also have a question regarding asymetric AM modulation and the K3 - is it possible for the TX to exceed 100% positive modulation whilst maintaining less than 100% negative? Being only new to the AM mode, I am not sure if it is

Re: [Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-11 Thread Duncan Carter
Using the FM filter for AM transmit has been requested but may or may not happen. According to Wayne, this depends on whether it can meet transmit specs and development priorities. I'd like to have AM mainly to work one friend who is running 1950s Harvey Wells gear but all the filter slots

Re: [Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-11 Thread Andy Wood
Thanks for the reply Tom - your information is appreciated. I have been to your website a few times but I hadn't visited the AM page before. Lots of good information there. I had to read it a few times to take it all in. I have done some more research and it appears the K3 TX has a quite

Re: [Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-11 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
Andy, This is probably the reason it currently cannot be modulated in excess of 100% positive. Maybe there will be an update in the future? You do not want more than 100% positive modulation with the K3. If one assumes 25W of carrier, 100% positive modulation represents 100W peak power

Re: [Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-11 Thread Andy Wood
Hi Joe, Yes, you are correct and I understand what you are saying. However, reduced carrier power from the K3 TX is not an issue if driving an external amplifier to, say, 100 watts carrier. In this case, output from the K3 may be only 10 watts carrier (40w peak), leaving plenty of overhead to

Re: [Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-11 Thread Mark Stennett
In AM analog broadcast, asymmetrical modulation is standard fare. http://www.vorsis.com/pdfnfoto/Vorsis%20AM10%20InkJet%20090722.pdf Output specs on page 7. 73 de na6m On 5/11/2010 10:08 PM, Andy Wood wrote: Hi Joe, Yes, you are correct and I understand what you are saying. However,

Re: [Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-11 Thread Andy Wood
Gee, that is a nice toy Mark. I wonder how many K3's you could buy for the price of one of those units Andy VK4KY -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-AM-TX-Questions-and-Observations-tp5033894p5039455.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list

[Elecraft] K3 AM TX - Questions and Observations

2010-05-10 Thread Andy Wood
I have recently been experimenting with AM on the low bands using the K3. The addition of Sync AM RX makes such a difference! I have noticed on AM TX, use of compression, at any level, causes some distortion of the waveform at the zero crossing (when viewed on an oscilloscope) - not really an